The Difference between Senators Lindsey Graham and Tom Cotton

Rally for Haiti on the 8th anniversary of the earthquake in Miami, Fl.
Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images

New Orleans   President Trump seems determined to remind the American people and the world that he is a chauvinist and racist, and his recent vulgar and boorish behavior in a White House conference on trying to sort out a deal that includes a government shutdown and a path forward on immigration and the Dreamers is just the most recent example. Trump is by now a known commodity, so we should sadly expect this from him, even as we continue to demand more. We need to worry more about the Trump effect and what it is doing to any semblance of character and dignity in American politics, and there is no better example than the reports that emerge from other witnesses to the Trump tirades and what they reveal.

We could make a point about the fact that Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, long an outspoken advocate for the rights of immigrants broke the code of silence on the meeting, and revealed Trump’s comments to the president’s embarrassment, though it seems not his shame. We won’t do that because he’s a Democrat and some might tune out the message as partisanship. We’re talking about character and dignity as bedrock national principles, so let’s look at two southern senators who were in the room with the President in order to see this more clearly.

Lindsay Graham and Tom Cotton are both Republican Senators and both are from the South, Graham from South Carolina and Cotton from Arkansas. Both are ambitious. Graham had a brief run for President, losing in the early primaries. Cotton is widely touted as a wannabe future candidate. Graham has reportedly mended his fences with Trump and become a valued adviser and interpreter for the President, especially on immigration. Cotton has been the subject of numerous media reports that he is the “Trump whisperer” offering a sounding board for the President and hugely influential.

Reports now emerging from the meeting are giving a clearer picture. It turns out that Graham rebutted and chided the President after his racist remarks, correctly saying that “America is an idea not a people.” His comments were reported by others, including Durbin. They were lengthy, well understood and widely heard, just as the President’s remarks were. Cotton on the other hand when asked, claimed that he heard nothing. How is that possible? Was he in another room? Had he left to take a call or visit the washroom? Or, is he just “playing politics” and trying to protect the President and his own policy positions and access to Trump. He has not offered an alibi that I have heard, and likely believes his “see no evil, hear no evil” answer serves as his “no comment” on the whole affair. Several other Republican Senators who were not at the meeting were clear that the President needed to apologize to the American people and other countries that he disparaged. Cotton, continuing to dishonor himself and his state, says no such thing.

Plutarch, centuries ago wrote “a small thing…often makes a greater revelation of character than battles where thousands die.” The one thing that Americans and the world are going to takeaway from the Trump presidency and its horrific escapades is that character is hugely important in the leadership and stewardship of a country and its highest offices. It trumps party, politics, and short term transactional policy points.

A country song has the lines, “if you don’t stand for something, you don’t stand for nothing at all.” Senator Tom Cotton has now proven that he has insufficient character to be in public life and stands for nothing at all aside from his own petty ambition. Trump has proven conclusively that such vacuity disqualifies you for any office and Graham has established that character is a minimum standard for public leadership, no matter what your position.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Crazy? Who You Calling Crazy?!?

New Orleans   This is what we’ve come to now. A little less than one year into the Trump term, we have the President of the United States claiming he is “stable” and a “genius.” It is unimaginable that we have a sitting president who feels forced to have to publicly defend himself from the popular perception that he is both crazy and intellectually out of his depth in the office. Oh, mercy, what is to become of us!

Trump of course has made gossip reporter, Michael Wolff’s book, a top of the heap, sure-fire best seller and a topic of constant, unrelenting conversation. Pundits are having a field day. They both get to tut-tut and raise their eyebrows about Wolff’s reputation as a bit loose with the truth, while also underlining how much of what he is writing is common knowledge.

Trump of course in a not-so-smart move despite his protests, guaranteed the book would be huge by preemptively cutting the cord to his former drum major, Stephen Bannon, because of his caustic comments about Trump’s family, thereby bringing even more attention to the remarks. He then ham-handedly had his legal attack dogs threaten the publisher, Henry Holt, to prevent publication, and to course this being business, not a reality show, the publisher than published the book even sooner. Trump not being a student of politics or interested in the experience of any other folks who even visited the Oval Office is oblivious to Senator Huey Long’s dicta that there is “no adequate defense to a public attack.”

All of this is the usual drama-rama that surrounds him. Mostly his comments were the equivalent of his efforts to light a brush fire to redirect a total conflagration. The most troubling reports were the ones that everyone seems to agree were totally factual and that was the observation that 100% of the White House and West Wing staff are convinced that the president is so out of his depth that they pursue their jobs single-mindedly trying to prevent the country from careening into even worse catastrophes. Conservative columnist, Ross Douthat of the Times, drew on historical precedents citing a “petticoat government,” under Woodrow Wilson and other strains, but worse pointed out that President Trump’s lack of capacity, rather than any specific incapacity, was a hold-your-breath moment for the country for another three years.

Trump’s claims of his stability and mental firepower are his feeble efforts to combat what has become an everyday popular understanding about his incapacity, his disinterest in reading, his television habit, his tweeting, and his constant and dangerous sense of personal grievance, narcissism, and insecurity. While we have to worry about the fate of the country and our democracy, Trump’s enablers are tearing apart the fabric behind his smokescreen and taking credit for preventing the nation from even worse problems in the name of their self-servicing claim of patriotism.

Oh, Lord!

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail