<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wade Rathke: Chief Organizer Blog &#187; affordable housing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chieforganizer.org/tag/affordable-housing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chieforganizer.org</link>
	<description>Founder of ACORN, Chief Organizer at ACORN International, Author of Citizen Wealth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:12:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Tenants?  More Rights!</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/01/30/more-tenants-more-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/01/30/more-tenants-more-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreclosure crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landlord licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=4317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Toronto  Given the housing and foreclosure crisis in the United States, it was not surprising to see that homeownership rates have fallen rapidly in recent years.  The Wall Street Journal published an estimate saying:</p>
<p>The nation&#8217;s home-ownership rate is also falling, to 67% of U.S. households in 2010, after topping 69% in 2004, according to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4318" title="2739044670_102bbef9d9-1" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/2739044670_102bbef9d9-1-200x150.jpg" alt="2739044670_102bbef9d9-1" width="200" height="150" /></em><em>Toronto </em> Given the housing and foreclosure crisis in the United States, it was not surprising to see that homeownership rates have fallen rapidly in recent years.  The Wall Street Journal published an estimate saying:</p>
<p>The nation&#8217;s home-ownership rate is also falling, to 67% of U.S. households in 2010, after topping 69% in 2004, according to the Census Bureau, with further declines expected. Each 1% decline represents one million households moving to rentals, housing experts say.</p>
<p>Conservatively that means 2 million fewer homeowners in the USA.  Where are they going?  Into rentals.  The same WSJ article estimates the following:</p>
<p>Renter households now top a record 37 million after increasing more than 3.5 million in the past five years, partly due to the foreclosure crisis. Green Street Advisors expects an additional 4.4 million rental households to be added by 2015.</p>
<p>Part of this increase is fueled by the transfer of owners to renters and part of it is undoubtedly fueled by the tightening credit markets that will produce longer term rents, particularly among the young in expanding markets.</p>
<p>It is hard not to think about tenants in Toronto.  At best only 50% of the city is composed of homeowners and estimates are only a little better than 60% in the greater Toronto area.  In the neighborhoods where ACORN Canada organizers virtually everyone is a tenant in one high rise complex after another.  The longest running organizing campaign not surprisingly has been the effort to win what we call, “landlord licensing,” which would be a process of licensing (and de-licensing) based on inspections (which would lead to repairs and improvements) and finally assure our tenants safe, decent, and even affordable housing.  In this long running battle the real estate interests cry like stuck pigs at our every proposal, but there has been sure and steady progress.  Last year winning a better auditing and inspections process, even though far short of licensing, according to the City of Toronto housing department led to $100 million in landlord upgrades and improvements.  Now ACORN Canada is trying to secure another small, but significant victory in this guerrilla campaign where a box would be required in the lobby of all major apartment complexes where the audit reports and improvements would be available to any tenant seeking to rent creating a transparency that would hopefully steer tenants towards better properties and shame landlords into making needed repairs.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no way to imagine cities with burgeoning numbers of tenants who will no longer be seeing apartments as way stations to homeownership but increasingly as permanent addresses and not realize that the long imbalance where landlords have held the upper hand and tenants in most cities and states have been virtually stripped of any rights, as a time bomb ticking.  New construction of apartment blocks is being accompanied by rental inflation, so there are bound to once again be calls for controls if (when?) greed laps past demand, but perhaps even more urgently there will need to be tenant rights campaigns, like the ones in Toronto, to secure basic housing decency for the millions and millions who now understand that apartments are central to the urban future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/01/30/more-tenants-more-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Come On! Private Banks Poaching Fannie Mae</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/01/22/come-on-private-banks-poaching-fannie-mae/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/01/22/come-on-private-banks-poaching-fannie-mae/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 15:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Suisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fannie Mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freddie Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldman sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jp morgan chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortgages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securitization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wells fargo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=4277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p></p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">subprime mortgage securitization</p>
<p>New Orleans On ESPN’s Sportscenter during the seasons they have a feature called “Come on!” in which they feature unbelievable or bonehead plays.  We need that in other fields of public life and politics.  Reading about the efforts of banks like Wells Fargo and JP Morgan Chase along with the various [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> </em></p>
<p><em></p>
<div id="attachment_4278" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-4278" title="subprime-mortgage-securitization" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/subprime-mortgage-securitization-200x150.jpg" alt="subprime mortgage securitization" width="200" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">subprime mortgage securitization</p></div>
<p>New Orleans </em>On ESPN’s <em>Sportscenter </em>during the seasons they have a feature called “Come on!” in which they feature unbelievable or bonehead plays.  We need that in other fields of public life and politics.  Reading about the efforts of banks like Wells Fargo and JP Morgan Chase along with the various trade associations to try to get their noses under the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac restructuring tent to shill a profit by issuing government secured mortgages, I could only thing:  Oh, come on!  How ridiculous!!  These are the same banks that just brought us the Great Recession due to their irresponsible lending and securitization schemes, and now they should somehow be allowed to profitably issue government mortgages.  Though by now we all ought to be used to the way that Wall Street thumbs their nose at all of the economic realities that all of us face, this is wildly unbelievable.</p>
<p>Reading the <em>New York Times </em>article by Louise Story, it was clear this was another predator’s ball with not only Wells and Chase at the trough, but also Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, and Morgan Stanley.  All of this reminds me of the scam that the Obama Administration stopped in recent years of allowing private interests to wildly profit as the middle men brokers for federally offered student loans.  Banks were making out like, well how else can I say this, bandits.  Stopping this sticky fingered scandal saved huge amounts of money, but now they are baaaaccccckkkkk with something perhaps even more outrageous.</p>
<p>The other backassedwards part of this is the problem of misdirected blame that still falls in the direction of Fannie/Freddie for <em>supposedly </em>bringing down the house by loaning to lower income citizens without looking at affordability or sustainability.  I understand the ideological need to blame the poor, but it’s important to point out that there is still no factual evidence that these loans, that should have been encouraged by the government, had anything to do with the mess.    Not only would we be throwing out the baby rather than the bathwater, but it seems we would be institutionalizing the bathwater and leaving the baby homeless, so to speak.</p>
<p>There’s probably a debate worth having about how many and how much of the “middle class” need to have federally guaranteed mortgages through these vehicles, but it seems obvious the we will need even firmer support for working class families in the future to have a chance at home ownership in we ever get out of this recession.  We need to slap away the hands trying to pretend this is all a cookie jar, and tell them to not only mind their own business, but maybe even try to get better at it than they have been (let’s see banks portfolio more mortgages on their own before they claim to know how to issue others), and keep federal institutions trying to solve the puzzle of adequate and affordable housing for all Americans again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/01/22/come-on-private-banks-poaching-fannie-mae/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rave Reviews for ACORN International in Dharavi</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/10/13/rave-reviews-for-acorn-international-in-dharavi/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/10/13/rave-reviews-for-acorn-international-in-dharavi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 12:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community Organizations International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Organizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN Foundation (India)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bombay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dharvi Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ragpickers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slumdwellers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vinod SHetty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=3786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="wp-caption-text">From the National Geographic article featuring ACORN International ragpickers.</p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">From National Geographic Article </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Mumbai      Vinod Shetty, ACORN India&#8217;s Director, and I had been meeting for hours along Juhu Road at the Sip &#8216;N Munch going through our work list of what needed to be done on campaigns around remittances, the Commonwealth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_3787" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3787" title="The Real Slumdogs" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/4925_the-real-slumdogs-12_04700300-200x127.jpg" alt="From the National Geographic article featuring ACORN International ragpickers." width="200" height="127" /><p class="wp-caption-text">From the National Geographic article featuring ACORN International ragpickers.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_3788" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3788" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/4925_the-real-slumdogs-08_04700300-200x127.jpg" alt="From National Geographic Article " width="200" height="127" /><p class="wp-caption-text">From National Geographic Article </p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">Mumbai      Vinod Shetty, ACORN India&#8217;s Director, and I had been meeting for hours along Juhu Road at the Sip &#8216;N Munch going through our work list of what needed to be done on campaigns around remittances, the Commonwealth Games, and multi-national food contractors and their labor law violations.  We had discussed the great progress of our Dharavi recycling center.  He had told me the good news that Joseph Campana&#8217;s project for us of producing a book that would support our Dharavi work finally had a publisher in Harper-Collins-India.  We had talked about the prospects for acquiring a set of scales and a crushing machine to be able to raise the prices for our plastic recycling and increase our waste pickers wages.  We had checked the dates and filings on our paperwork for the ACORN Foundation (India).  We had discussed our efforts to repackage and sell products being produced in Dharavi for Diwali and other festival dates to our school recycling partners like Eco-Mundial and the American School.  We had taken notes for reports owed to our friends at BCGEU and SEIU.  There were a lot of items ticked off the list.</p>
<p>Finally at that point Vinod pulled out a staff of glossy magazines and newspapers with almost a blush.  The magazines ran the gamut.  One was the Clean India Journal which focused on environmental progress for companies, contractors, and others in India and featured our work in September in a piece called, “Waste Matters for Green Workers” about our ragpicker organization in Dharavi.  Another in a the “green” issue of an upscale fashion monthly called Jade and style magazine was entitled “Green Heroes:  Ragpickers or City Savers?”  (Access both on our website at www.acorninternational.org)   Later he forwarded me another piece published on several websites by a Londoner which was not quite as gushing but referred to our ragpickers as “invisbile heroes” in http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/3790-Invisible-heroes-of-Dharavi.  An article distributed for school children in a “weekly reader” style publication called Robin Age also contained a recent feature.</p>
<p>Looking quickly, the Jade piece by Sugatha Menon ended with the lines:<br />
<span id="more-3786"></span><br />
<em></p>
<div id="attachment_3789" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><em><img class="size-medium wp-image-3789" title="recycle1-1" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/recycle1-1-200x150.jpg" alt="Ragpickers in the Dharvi Project" width="200" height="150" /></em><p class="wp-caption-text">Ragpickers in the Dharvi Project</p></div>
<p>As I write this story, a message pops<br />
in my mailbox, the US ambassador<br />
to India is visiting Acorn’s waste<br />
segregation center today… paucity of<br />
time doesn’t permit me to go for the<br />
event, but I sincerely wish for many more<br />
mighty oaks for this Acorn.</em></p>
<p>Wow!  Feeling the love in Bombay!  What a pleasure to read for a beaten down veteran of the USA based searches like me which are dominated by right wing zealots, conspiratorialists, and general haterators.  Why doesn&#8217;t Google search worldwide for me?!?</p>
<p>Reading the Clean India Journal, I couldn&#8217;t believe what I was reading.  A straightforward and accurate overview caught my eye:</p>
<p>Laxmi and several others form the recycling clan of Dharavi. And, they are all part of Acorn Foundation (India), Mumbai, a registered charity trust affiliated to Acorn International or the Association of Community Organisations for Reform Now. Acorn International is a community based NGO working in 12 countries across the world. It has been fighting on issues like right to affordable housing, living wages, water, sanitation, education and healthcare in India. One of their projects – the Dharavi Project – Acorn aims to organise and train the ragpickers in scientific methods of waste handling, segregation and recycling. Besides Mumbai, the organisation also works to improve the lives of the ragpickers in cities like Delhi and Bangalore.</p>
<p>In the “Invisible Heroes” piece the last paragraphs are equally powerful by Delhi based Anna  da  Costa:</p>
<p>like many countries, especially in the developed world, India already has a skilled recycling and sorting workforce in place. “India’s recycling industry has the expertise and capacity to scale massively, but it needs to be properly valued, formalised and supported,” said Shetty as we sat in his Mumbai office. There are signs of change, “But these need to be magnified.”<br />
I looked down at Shetty’s desk where a series of small ID cards were carefully laid out, identifying recyclers as members of the “Dharavi project”. An image of a young boy, who could not have been more than nine years old, gazed back at me, accompanied by a name in bold type: “Sameer”. For Sameer, this card is the difference between invisibility and visibility, anonymity and belonging. For India, it is a step on the long road to tackling the enormous waste challenge, and creating dignified, green jobs.</p>
<p>One article had such a “crush” line about Vinod that he would have to be careful showing his wife the piece.</p>
<p>It was great praise and a long way from building power, but as we rose it felt like progress in Mumbai for our rag pickers in this huge world capital of the poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/10/13/rave-reviews-for-acorn-international-in-dharavi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Memphis Giveaways to Developers</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/11/23/memphis-giveaways-to-developers/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/11/23/memphis-giveaways-to-developers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Organizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memphis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=2454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> Memphis Even though I wasn’t speaking at the University of Memphis about Citizen Wealth until Monday evening, it was worth flying in the predawn on Sunday to be able to take advantage of Professor Ken Reardon’s offer to meet with twenty community leaders who wanted to talk over dinner about how to push Memphis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> <a href="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Upton_and_Buehler.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2455" title="Upton_and_Buehler" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Upton_and_Buehler-200x159.jpg" alt="Upton_and_Buehler" width="200" height="159" /></a>Memphis </em>Even though I wasn’t speaking at the University of Memphis about <em>Citizen Wealth </em>until Monday evening, it was worth flying in the predawn on Sunday to be able to take advantage of Professor Ken Reardon’s offer to meet with twenty community leaders who wanted to talk over dinner about how to push Memphis to do both more and better in serving all the communities and constituencies in the Bluff City.  It was a treat to meet members of the faith community, organizers, lawyers, activists, and academics that had led efforts over the years, including Shelby County Inter-faith, a significant community organization here in the 80’s and 90’s, and RISE, an important campaign in Memphis targeted at predatory practices (music to my ears!).   I couldn’t believe we had been talking for four hours with the clock struck 11 PM!  The time had flown with so many ideas, issues, and things that needed to be done.</p>
<p>Many themes returned again and again, but one of the themes that echoed so loudly that it was impossible not to hear was the way that developers were literally having their way with the City of Memphis and Shelby County.  A more than $100 million dollar giveaway of public dollars for one developer of the Memphis Fairgrounds was averted with no<strong><em> </em></strong>community benefits agreement asked or offered for the nearby communities.  Planners in the afternoon told me story after story of developers benefiting from 15 year tax incremental financing (TIF) districts in the by-and-by hopes of community benefits without any efforts to assure community benefits on the front end.  It was enough to make my head spin.</p>
<p><span id="more-2454"></span>These were great leaders, well trained and experienced with a good grip on the issues and the nuances of Memphis, who needed a process to finally make a decision to re-engage resources and participation for this generation of organizations and activists to curb the excesses and try to wrest the city away from the developers and their public lackeys and back to the people.</p>
<p>The last point made by a well respected minister at dinner caught my ear.  A developer named Harold Buehler was being given 140 lots in a lower income, inner city area of Memphis, despite owing over $2 million in taxes for his previous developments.  People were outraged.  There was a roar of response about the “fix” being in with the County Commissioners.  It all seemed so wild and bizarre, I knew I would have to look under the hood to try and figure it out.</p>
<p>I found a squib by Jackson Baker in something called the “political beat” in the <em>Memphis Flyer. </em>Despite Baker’s bias in favor of Buehler and his contempt for Commissioner Henri Brooks, and anyone who opposes this project, his piece does confirm the facts behind the minister’s disgust and my new friends’ revulsion at this action:</p>
<p>Memphis Mayor Pro Tem Myron Lowery spoke before the commission on the premise that it would be folly not to develop the vacant lots Buehler sought title over (140 out of some 3,000 in the inner city, including many that were the result of arson and neglect). Antonio Burks, the former Memphis Tigers basketball star who was recently wounded by gunfire, showed up on crutches to extol Buehler for having provided Burks’ mother a rental home for the past decade.</p>
<p>Even a Klondike resident who had been featured in The Commercial Appeal as opposing Buehler rental property on style points was shown in a Buehler-produced video extolling the builder for having arrived at new designs. (Both the video and several posterboard displays of previous Buehler properties were stage-managed by Upton.)</p>
<p>Buehler opponents got up to speak, too, including one man who said,” We need to do a background check on this criminal.”</p>
<p>Besides Brooks, overt opposition on the commission itself was limited to another longtime critic of the builder, Mike Ritz, who succeeded in adding an amendment to Commissioner Steve Mulroy’s enabling resolution, one that required full repayment of Buehler’s delinquent taxes. Another Ritz amendment, which would have mandated approval of Buehler designs by community development organizations in all affected areas, was rejected.</p>
<p>In any case, Wednesday’s apparently definitive vote notwithstanding, Brooks announced that she intended to soldier on. “I’ve just begun to fight,” she said — though how and with what allies and to what end remained to be seen.</p>
<p>From this piece it looks like a “Hail Mary” pass forcing Buehler to pay up before he cashes in on these lots may have landed safely in the end zone, so I’ll have to check on that, but regardless of the pros and cons here, there’s no doubt that the community is increasingly clear that Memphis cannot continue to be developer heaven and community hell.  One dinner guest who lives near the development in Memphis caught my ear making the point that the area had housing, but “needed jobs!”  There were other comments that could not be missed about the need for people to have a “voice” again and the lack of equity and citizen centered priorities in Memphis.</p>
<p>It was great to be a fly on the wall and an excuse for some great people to get together who could make a difference in Memphis by deciding once again that “enough is enough,” and taking the next steps to make something happen again in this great city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/11/23/memphis-giveaways-to-developers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suburban Affordable Housing Breakthrough</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/08/11/suburban-affordable-housing-breakthrough/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/08/11/suburban-affordable-housing-breakthrough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=1998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> Dauphine Island	Westchester County, the affluent suburb outside of New York City, finally had to concede the obvious and admit that they had had not only allowed, but done nothing to prevent the creation of lily white communities throughout the County, and this amounts to racial segregation.  They agreed to settle a lawsuit filed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/06rej583.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1999" title="06rej583" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/06rej583-200x101.jpg" alt="06rej583" width="200" height="101" /></a> Dauphine Island	Westchester County, the affluent suburb outside of New York City, finally had to concede the obvious and admit that they had had not only allowed, but done nothing to prevent the creation of lily white communities throughout the County, and this amounts to racial segregation.  They agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by the Anti-Discrimination Center in NYC by buying or building $50 Million worth of affordable housing (about 650 units) seeded around the county.   The settlement was partially brokered by officials of HUD.  This is a breakthrough!</p>
<p>Fair and affordable housing is the threshold issue for creating increased racial diversity in communities, schools, and other institutions.  The historic role of federal housing finance institutions in actually enabling and allowing racially restrictive and discriminatory covenants by financing the construction of huge suburbs particularly the Levittowns in Long Island and outside Philadelphia, which became the gold standards for suburban development, is one of the shameful chapters of government assisted racism in the 20th century.  This settlement could be precedent setting, particularly if HUD gets on the stick and uses some of these terms as templates for other suburbs.</p>
<p><span id="more-1998"></span></p>
<p>[Incidentally, I recommend highly a new book by Thomas J. Sugrue, The Sweet Land of Liberty:  The Forgotten Struggle for Civil Rights in the North.    Not only does Sugrue do an excellent job of looking at competing visions for suburban development between Levitt and developers willing to prove that suburbs could work that were also integrated, but he also does a good job at raising up other activists that broke hard ground in the North, even while the South was seen as the more fundamental battleground for racial equity.  His balanced treatment of welfare rights organizing was a bonus in this package, especially his sensitive and respectful handling of some of the indigenous leaders of welfare rights in Boston and Philadelphia, especially Roxanne Jones, who becomes an iconic, bridging figure in Sugrue’s work.  Thanks to Professor Bob Fisher at University of Connecticut School of Social Work in Hartford for bringing this volume to my attention as soon as it came out.]</p>
<p>The key handle in this lawsuit cum settlement is one that bears some quick, strategic research by those of us committed to equity issues as well as union organizers with an eye to finally recapturing residential construction.  Westchester County had reflectively signed block grant agreements for CDBG funds without making any efforts to in fact assure that steps were being taken to desegregate and ensure fair housing.  The manipulation and false application of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG funds) has been a scandal for years that no one has wanted to understand or investigate, and is therefore a huge opportunity for community organizations and organizers to turn the tables fundamentally.</p>
<p>This excerpt from the Times article by Sam Roberts on the settlement spells it out clearly:<br />
“The lawsuit, filed under the federal False Claims Act, argued that when Westchester applied for federal Community Development Block Grants for affordable housing and other projects, county officials treated part of the application as boilerplate — lying when they claimed to have complied with mandates to encourage fair housing.</p>
<p>A Westchester official originally dismissed the suit as “garbage.” But the county was largely repudiated in February when Judge Denise L. Cote ruled in Federal District Court that between 2000 and 2006 it had misrepresented its efforts to desegregate overwhelmingly white communities when it applied for the federal housing funds.</p>
<p>Judge Cote concluded that Westchester had made little or no effort to find out where low-income housing was being placed, or to finance homes and apartments in communities that opposed affordable housing.<br />
As part of Monday’s agreement, the county admitted that it has the authority to challenge zoning rules in villages and towns that in many cases implicitly discourage affordable housing by setting minimum lot sizes, discouraging higher-density developments or appropriating vacant property for other purposes. Westchester agreed to “take legal action to compel compliance if municipalities hinder or impede the county” in complying with the agreement.”</p>
<p>Let’s get busy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/08/11/suburban-affordable-housing-breakthrough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

