<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wade Rathke: Chief Organizer Blog &#187; Campaign for America&#8217;s Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chieforganizer.org/tag/campaign-for-americas-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chieforganizer.org</link>
	<description>Author of Citizen Wealth: Winning the Campaign to Save Working Families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mechanics or Movement</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/06/06/mechanics-or-movement/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/06/06/mechanics-or-movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign for America's Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reform Immigration FOR America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reverand Walter "Slim" Coleman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sister Mary McCauley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=1553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New  Orleans Waiting for my US Air flight from DC/National Airport (I  won’t call it Ronald Reagan!), I saw Reverend Walter “Slim” Coleman  from Chicago getting his shoes shined across from my gate.  I walked  over and sat in the next chair and visited with him a minute.   I asked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><em>New  Orleans </em>Waiting for my US Air flight from DC/National Airport (I  won’t call it Ronald R</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1555" title="sister_mary_mccauley1" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/sister_mary_mccauley1.jpg" alt="sister_mary_mccauley1" width="177" height="203" /></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">eagan!), I saw Reverend Walter “Slim” Coleman  from Chicago getting his shoes shined across from my gate.  I walked  over and sat in the next chair and visited with him a minute.   I asked him about his evaluation of the recent Summit on immigration  reform we had both attended.  He looked over to me, and said simply,  “good mechanics.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">That  clear and concise statement clarified an uneasiness I had felt all week  after attending two great conferences marking the emergence of the progressive  movement at the Campaign for America’s Future and then the launching  at the summit of the Reform Immigration FOR America campaign to win  comprehensive legislation on immigration finally.  The meetings  were great.  The graphics were excellent.  The plenary sessions  brought in speakers that rocked the halls and tents were the meetings  were held.  The events were meticulously organized and the staff  and volunteers did bang up jobs at both meetings, yet there was still  a hollow “but” there for me and many others less articulate that  Slim.<span id="more-1553"></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Part  of it is the Beltway effort to try and “manage” the deep and fierce  anger that still lives in the breasts of both progressives and immigrant  advocates.  In DC there seems to be an unstated collective consensus  to hold one’s breath and tiptoe around the immense popularity and  good will generated by the new president which replaced the visceral  rejection of the Bush years.  There seems to be something more  like the “hope” for reform and a feeling of no one wanting to take  a chance of blowing it, rather than a real ramping up and a press for  all the change that we can wrest out of the historical moment.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">I’ve  been organizing too long perhaps, but the evidence I would marshal for  this argument is both on the nuts and bolts as well as the soul of the  events. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">The  workshops seemed part of a pacification program, not deliberately, but  effectively.  These were places to allow the “troops” to participate,  rather than to build consensus or momentum.  20 people talking  about fighting foreclosures at the CFAF and 9 on the 287g fight in Phoenix  makes the real issues people are feeling seem like sidebar to the stagecraft  that the DC-based organizers were trying to create in order to leverage  legislation.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Every  once in a while something would break out the mechanics mold, and it  was hard to miss the response to the moment. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">The  example that struck me was a speech at the Summit on Thursday evening  by  a nun from Postville, Iowa, who read her remarks  from the trenches where she deal with immigrants and their issues <em> as individuals</em> and from the lofty position of a clear and stark  morality around this issue.  Her speech was an organizer’s nightmare.   She had something to say, had written it all out, and was reading every  word.  The mistress of ceremony gracefully stood closer and closer  to her as the minutes went on and on, helpless to bring the speech to  an end.  There were no histrionics.  This was an expression  of faith and justice.  As Sister Mary slogged on, one could see  a hustle among the tables, as people started realizing something was  happening off-program.  At my table people starting asking “Who  is that?” partly in amusement and partly out of curiosity.  They  started listening.  They heard Sister Mary turn to Anna Ashley  Garcia and say that these were her final comments and then go on for  another ten minutes.  Surprisingly when she actually did finish,  more than 700 people rose to their feet from their dinner conversations  in applause.   Sister Mary was one of their people.   She was someone who was there on her own steam without a care about  the negotiations in the back room and the headcounts from the White  House or the spin of the war rooms, but who was there because justice  had to be won.  The time was now. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Someone  from the base was finally on the stage and raising their voice.   Something was happening that was authentic.  They were applauding  with the solidarity of understanding that victory for all of us in these  critical fights will be in the field and closely allied to real people  and real problems that force their messy way to resolution in legislation. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">A  movement can’t be manufactured, bottled, sold, or even represented.   A movement transcends mechanics and finds its force, expression, and  natural level.  Now is the time to take the new shackles off the  movement and finally win something real.</span>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F06%2F06%2Fmechanics-or-movement%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F06%2F06%2Fmechanics-or-movement%2F&amp;source=worldorganizers&amp;style=normal&amp;service=TinyURL.com" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/06/06/mechanics-or-movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progressive Tension</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/06/02/progressive-tension/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/06/02/progressive-tension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 11:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ideas and Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign for America's Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Washington The  newly named Campaign for America’s Future, which bills itself as an  annual meeting for progressives, opened in DC yesterday.  I’ve  attended several of these meetings in the past, and an undercurrent  of the session seemed to me to indicate that progressives are disoriented  and confused.</p>
<p>Robert  Borsage in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><em>Washington </em>The  newly named Campaign for America’s Future, which bills itself as an  annual meeting for progressives, ope</span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;"><em><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1532" title="take-back-america-006" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/take-back-america-006-200x266.jpg" alt="take-back-america-006" width="173" height="230" /></em></span><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">ned in DC yesterday.  I’ve  attended several of these meetings in the past, and an undercurrent  of the session seemed to me to indicate that progressives are disoriented  and confused.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Robert  Borsage in his opening remarks seemed to acknowledge the underlying  tension without trying to resolve it.  He said that when people  asked if they intended to work with the administration or push the administration,  they answered, “yes.”  There was a laugh in the room that was still  filling, but it seemed hollow to me and the morning seemed to establish  the tone. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">The  crispness of the critique was gone.  These were sessions in which  old friends seemed to be circling around the issues and the evidence  of being “in” or “out” with the direction of Obama and his machinery.There was celebration and joy of the election, and there was great hope,  but there was a tentativeness everywhere it seemed to me.  This  was “liberals in love.”  People were holding their breath and desperately  hoping that they would see real wins with real meanings on key issue,  but they were so resigned to following the President that they seemed  to not want to jinx anything through sharp comment or decisive action. <span id="more-1531"></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">Past  meetings had been loud and crowded.  This session on the first  day seemed so much smaller, quieter, and subdued.  It also seemed  grey, old, and white in a way that makes one uneasy about self-identifying  as a progressive.  The debate, if there was any, seemed about pragmatism  and how to reconcile to it, rather than progressive principles and how  to push now to realize them. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">This  meeting seemed to be stifled in a classic Beltway dilemma where isolated  from any base the main point seemed to be trying to find a position  and posture to find a way to orbit this larger sun.  Maybe we are  not used to being close to winning?  Maybe we have forgotten that  some of this same glow was felt for Clinton and even Carter, but we  definitely need to snap out of it if we’re going to carry weight in  the fight.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">I  commented to a friend over dinner that it seemed we were on our knees  debating whether to simply kiss butt on the one hand or just pray on  the other.  Neither seems to me to be a winning strategy, or frankly,  even helpful in getting the administration and the work done. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: small;">If  this is our time, we had best figure it out fast!</span>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F06%2F02%2Fprogressive-tension%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F06%2F02%2Fprogressive-tension%2F&amp;source=worldorganizers&amp;style=normal&amp;service=TinyURL.com" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/06/02/progressive-tension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
