<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wade Rathke: Chief Organizer Blog &#187; EITC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chieforganizer.org/tag/eitc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chieforganizer.org</link>
	<description>Founder of ACORN, Chief Organizer at ACORN International, Author of Citizen Wealth, Global Grassroots and The Battle for the 9th Ward.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Finally Regulating Tax Preparers</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/01/05/finally-regulating-tax-preparers/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/01/05/finally-regulating-tax-preparers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EITC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[h&r black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=2628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> Octatel This may be a case of doing the right thing for the wrong reason, but under any circumstance, it is good news for the the 60% of American taxpayers who pay money to tax preparers for help with their returns:  the IRS finally announced that they are going to require certification and registration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> <a href="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/IRS.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2629" title="IRS" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/IRS-200x162.jpg" alt="IRS" width="200" height="162" /></a>Octatel </em>This may be a case of doing the right thing for the wrong reason, but under any circumstance, it is good news for the the 60% of American taxpayers who pay money to tax preparers for help with their returns:  the IRS finally announced that they are going to require certification and registration for tax preparers!  This could finally be a step in regulating the Wild West of tax prep land, which is fraught with abuse.  It is also likely a sop being thrown to the big mega-preparers like H&amp;R Block, Jackson-Hewitt, and Liberty Tax Services to allow them to bring more order to an industry where even being huge only gives them less than one-third of the market.</p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>Even as the lumbering, passive bureaucracy of the IRS moves towards regulation, they note that CPAs won&#8217;t have to register, because they are already licensed, and free tax preparers, like those that once existed at the ACORN Centers when I used to work there, won&#8217;t have to have special certifications.  What they did not say, but could have said for the free tax preparers is that to get the IRS filing number for a free VITA center, we already had to get certified!  The article in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> made it sound like the IRS was being generous, but the facts, as usual, are wildly different, since it&#8217;s rather a case essentially of having already forced service centers for the poor to have to be regulated, and finally now having them get around to the rest of the industry!</p>
<p><span id="more-2628"></span>But, I hate to quibble, because this is a good thing.  The IRS even announced that they are going to reach out to the 10,000 or more preparers who make the most errors.  Hmmmm.  The rest of us make a mistake on our returns and we&#8217;re paying interest and penalties and enduring a world of hurt, but if you are a tax preparer the IRS is just finally carrying about the fact that 10,000 maniacs are making huge mistakes?!?  Perhaps a name change is in order and the word “Service” should be dropped from the title, and only Internal Revenue remain?</p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>H&amp;R Block spokespeople greeted the news as manna from heaven.  Why not, this will hurt their competition with the “mom and pops” out there.  It&#8217;s no surprise that the former head of HR&amp;Block has been the deputy commissioner of the IRS and would understand this problem exceedingly well.</p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>One way or another though this is good news for working stiffs who have been paying for help no matter the fact that this should have happened many, many years ago.</p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>Maybe the IRS will finally look at doing real outreach now to build citizen wealth through full participation in the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC).  I hope I&#8217;m not getting giddy and carried away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/01/05/finally-regulating-tax-preparers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santa Barbara Finally Pulls Up Short</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/12/26/santa-barbara-finally-pulls-up-short/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/12/26/santa-barbara-finally-pulls-up-short/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EITC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldman sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&R Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackson Hewitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty Tax Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Officer of the Controller of the Currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Capital Bancorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RALs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refund Anticipation Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Barbara Bank and Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Rossi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Quepos            It was an extra present under the palm tree to read in the pre-dawn that Santa Barbara Bank &#38; Trust was being pulled out of the business of factoring RALs, predatory refund anticipation loan for Jackson &#38; Hewitt and other companies in the viciously competitive tax services market for lower  income and working families.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2603" title="jackson hewitt logo" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/jackson-hewitt.gif" alt="jackson hewitt logo" width="200" height="200" />Quepos            </em>It was an extra present under the palm tree to read in the pre-dawn that Santa Barbara Bank &amp; Trust was being pulled out of the business of factoring RALs, predatory refund anticipation loan for Jackson &amp; Hewitt and other companies in the viciously competitive tax services market for lower  income and working families.  Several years ago direct negotiations with HSBC, previously the largest factor for such loans, had pulled out of the market (which I have discussed in <em>Citizen Wealth </em>at some length) and Chase had been reforming its practices, but Santa Barbara had been the big holdout.</p>
<p>            Partially, it was simply the “one that got away.”  It&#8217;s footprint was smaller with a base in Santa Barbara that was too far away from our groups and members to do much damage.  They had gotten into this predatory business and done very well, but were impervious to the impacts.  What did it matter to their normal customer base  in Santa Barbara after all?</p>
<p><span id="more-2602"></span></p>
<p>            Direct discussions with Jackson &amp; Hewitt, when I was with ACORN, when round-and-round, with J&amp;H always claiming they would not “unilaterally disarm,” but would do so as H&amp;R Block did so and others like Liberty Tax Services.  H&amp;R Block was going to move from HSBC to its own bank.  I&#8217;m not sure if that happened or not.  Liberty was also a big customer for Santa Barbara. </p>
<p>            The actions of OCC and other banking regulators are key here, because the withdrawal of Santa Barbara from this line of lending could finally push RALs out of the market, which would be huge.</p>
<p>            This was the Christmas present report from <em>Bloomberg News:</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p><em>Regulators ordered Santa Barbara Bank &amp; Trust to stop providing the loan money, which covered about 75 percent of Jackson Hewitt’s financial products program, according to a </em><a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1283552/000119312509259772/d8k.htm">regulatory filing</a><em> by Jackson Hewitt.</em></p>
<p><em>Shares of the company, the No. 2 tax preparer behind </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/h_and_r_block_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org">H&amp;R Block</a><em>, dropped $1.34 to $4.50 on Thursday. </em></p>
<p><em>The </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/comptroller_of_the_currency/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Office of the Comptroller of the Currency</a><em> told Santa Barbara Bank &amp; Trust on Dec. 18 that the lender would not receive regulatory approval to originate the refund anticipation loans in 2010, </em><a href="http://www.snl.com/irweblinkx/file.aspx?IID=100652&amp;FID=8796232">according to a statement</a><em> from the bank’s parent, the </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/pacific-capital-bancorp/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Pacific Capital Bancorp.</a><em> </em></p>
<p><em>A bank spokesman, Tony Rossi, said that “the tax refund loan business is a sort of niche business that falls outside of what would be considered core banking operations.” </em></p>
<p><em>The bank signed a nonbinding letter of intent with a </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/p/private_equity/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier">private equity</a><em> firm to sell the tax business, the statement said.</em></p>
<p><em>Tax preparers are locked in a battle for customers, with Jackson Hewitt vowing this month to regain market share from H&amp;R Block. Firms can attract clients with refund anticipation loans, in which customers who need cash immediately can get a short-term loan, typically lasting a few weeks, that is</em> <em>based on the expected amount of their tax refund.</em></p>
<p><em>Jackson Hewitt, with 6,600 outlets and almost three million clients, has been losing customers to H&amp;R Block and Intuit, which makes TurboTax software. It suspended its dividend in March and has hired </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/goldman_sachs_group_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Goldman Sachs</a><em> to explore “strategic alternatives,” language that typically means a company may be sold.</em></p>
<p>            The next target for economic justice reformers and citizen wealth advocates will need to be the unknown “private equity” company that will be tarnishing its reputation and brand – if such a concept is possible in private equity – by buying the Santa Barbara RALs business.  The other target may end up being whomever buys Jackson &amp; Hewitt if Goldman Sachs is able to do the offload.</p>
<p>            You sow what you reap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/12/26/santa-barbara-finally-pulls-up-short/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

