<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wade Rathke: Chief Organizer Blog &#187; hsbc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chieforganizer.org/tag/hsbc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chieforganizer.org</link>
	<description>Founder of ACORN, Chief Organizer at ACORN International, Author of Citizen Wealth, Global Grassroots and The Battle for the 9th Ward.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:43:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Corrupt Credit Business Model Travels to Chile and Brazil</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/07/24/a-corrupt-credit-business-model-travels-to-chile-and-brazil/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/07/24/a-corrupt-credit-business-model-travels-to-chile-and-brazil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 14:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remittances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit card scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dicom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equifax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itau-unibanco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organization of Consumers and Users of Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remitta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remittance Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stefan Larenas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=5137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> New Orleans Cred</p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">ODECU of Chile</p>
<p>it card scams are the bad penny perfected in the United States that is turning up now elsewhere in the world.   These practices are not the foul play of bad actors as predatory lenders always claim, but intrinsic elements of corrupt, exploitive business models.  The economic success stories in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> New Orleans </em>Cred</p>
<div id="attachment_5138" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 121px"><img class="size-full wp-image-5138" title="imagegen" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/imagegen.jpg" alt="ODECU of Chile" width="111" height="100" /><p class="wp-caption-text">ODECU of Chile</p></div>
<p>it card scams are the bad penny perfected in the United States that is turning up now elsewhere in the world.   These practices are not the foul play of bad actors as predatory lenders always claim, but intrinsic elements of corrupt, exploitive business models.  The economic success stories in Brazil and Chile now seem threatened by the avarice of casual corporate corruption matched as usual with light to non-existent regulation and consumer protection regimes.</p>
<p>In Brazil the debt to income ratio has risen from 22% to 40% in only five years from 2006 to 2011 according to a study quoted by Alexei Barrionuevo in <em>The New York Times. </em>In Chile in 7 years the ratio has goen to 70% according to the Central Bank.   There’s no question the model is predatory with interest annual interest rates reaching 220% in Brazil and no limits anywhere it seems.   The situation is especially intense at retail chain, freely issuing cards to working and moderate income customers to access basic consumer goods, and then routinely adjusting the terms and levels of the interest rates on the debt without any notice to the customer.</p>
<p>These cards were supported by transnational banking big boys like UK’s HSBC and Spain’s Santander and Itau-Unibanco, all of which, especially HSBC, absolutely knew better, but couldn’t resist the rip-off, knowing that they could get away with it.  When confronted by the prosecutor’s office in Brazil, the banks ignored appeals to fully compensate customers.</p>
<p>It was shocking to read that there are no only no limits to the level of interest rates in Chile, but also no way for an individual to be able to file for personal bankruptcy and get their act together.  Unfortunately, when ripped, there’s no way for them to run – or reorganize.  Stefan Larenas of the Organization of Consumers and Users of Chile, speaking about the Equifax-owned, unregulated Dicom credit score outfit in that country, was quoted ominously that, “If you are in Dicom, if you are not in hell, you are on the way there.  It is a true social stigma here.”  Seems a bad score not only bars you from any future loans, but is also seen as a legitimate reason to block you from future employment, creating a debtor’s prison without walls.</p>
<p>Predatory financial injustice is a global issue with most central banks simply burying their heads in the sand, just as our Remittance Justice Campaign has uncovered everywhere, and leaving workers and families nothing but fresh meet for corporate crime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/07/24/a-corrupt-credit-business-model-travels-to-chile-and-brazil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>H&amp;R Block, HSBC, &amp; the end of RALs</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/12/28/hr-block-hsbc-the-end-of-rals/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/12/28/hr-block-hsbc-the-end-of-rals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN Financial Justice Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit check]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&R Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackson Hewitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jp morgan chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Office of the Controller of the Currency (OCC)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RALs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refund Anticipation Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Barbara Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax preparers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax return]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=4159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> New Orleans Refund Anticipation Loans or RALs are a product that have preyed on lower income worker families since their inception and promotion by the big tax preparers, H&#38;R Block, Jackson-Hewitt, and Liberty, as well as smaller fry who could get access to credit.  Negotiating with these companies could get depressing when I worked [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> <img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4160" title="57334671TB002_Last_Minute_T" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Last_Minute_Taxpayers_715e-200x151.jpg" alt="57334671TB002_Last_Minute_T" width="200" height="151" />New Orleans </em>Refund Anticipation Loans or RALs are a product that have preyed on lower income worker families since their inception and promotion by the big tax preparers, H&amp;R Block, Jackson-Hewitt, and Liberty, as well as smaller fry who could get access to credit.  Negotiating with these companies could get depressing when I worked with the teams of ACORN members who the ACORN Financial Justice Center when better disclosure meant looking at a rate package that would be between 220 and 250% annualized.  There was never anything good about the products no matter what they were called, but their heartbeat was the desperate need of many families to have the money the few days quicker than it could be obtained from the IRS on an electronic or mail filing.</p>
<p>In a significant concession HSBC, the main lender to the large preparers, announced that it was departing the business in what they described to me, and I reported in <em>Citizen Wealth, </em>as “reputational” concerns.  Despite the fact that they were making almost $200M per year from this business, there was no way to disguise its predatory nature.  JP Morgan-Chase was another big player in a session where they were conceding that they would lower rates, asked me sarcastically if we thought it would be “better if they got out of the business,” to which we answered “yes!”  Santa Barbara Trust was the last major lender still hanging in the business.  HSBC has assured us that they were on a step down, transitional contract, which would pull them completely out of the business with H&amp;R Block by the end of 2009 while they dropped other companies immediately.</p>
<p>Given that background, I was both disappointed and delighted to read the news from H&amp;R Block that they were scrambling to replace HSBC as their lender and credit source for RALs for the 2011 tax season.  This should not have been a surprise to them, but it was a surprise to me to see that HSBC had continued to stand behind the RALs in 2011, long after they had assured me that they would be out of the business completely.  Clearly in the last 2 ½ years since I left ACORN the organization had taken its eye off of the target and the consequences had not been good for lower income working families who are dependent on professional preparers.  That is disappointing.</p>
<p>Delightful was seeing that the IRS finally did the right thing after having been an enabler to this thievery for so many years and eliminated a code this last summer that allowed tax preparers to know whether or not the likelihood was good that the filer would receive their entire refund sufficiently to cover the charges and fees being larded on by the preparers.  The IRS was effectively doing a low grade “credit check” for the preparers.  Disgusting!  Once they did that the Office of the Controller of the Currency (OCC), one of the many federal bank regulators, issued a determination barring HSBC and the like from such lending by classifying it now as too risky, despite a last minute contract extension that Block (after filing suit against HSBC for reneging on the contract) had negotiated with HSBC for the 2011 season where Block would cover all HSBC losses.  Finally the federales did the right thing!</p>
<p>Though this may be the death knell for RALs, which are a loan with interest, against the sums, some of the other predatory schemes will still survive.  Block announced that it would continue to fund refund anticipation checks, which are more like advances, through its own bank, the H&amp;R Block Bank.</p>
<p>These predatory operations have been crack cocaine for the big-time preparers for years, so it will take some time and effort to cut the heads off of theses snakes, but at least more of the tails are now going.</p>
<p><em>Thanks to Eileen A.J. Connelly and David Pitt, AP personal finance writers for a great story on these developments!</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/12/28/hr-block-hsbc-the-end-of-rals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACORN International Launches Remittance Justice Campaign</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/12/06/acorn-international-launches-remittance-justice-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/12/06/acorn-international-launches-remittance-justice-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community Organizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george brown college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kay Bisnah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoneyGram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remittance Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Remittances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tornoto Dominion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=4076</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> Phoenix In Vancouver, Toronto, Ottawa, and Hamilton ACORN International and ACORN Canada joined today to dramatically step up the international campaign to achieve improved access and fair pricing for remittances from immigrant families and their relatives in their home countries.</p>
<p>Today in Toronto Kay Bisnah, President of ACORN International, also unveiled an extensive report underpinning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> <img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4077" title="Money_Orders_25" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Money_Orders_25-200x85.jpg" alt="Money_Orders_25" width="200" height="85" />Phoenix </em>In Vancouver, Toronto, Ottawa, and Hamilton ACORN International and ACORN Canada joined today to dramatically step up the international campaign to achieve improved access and fair pricing for remittances from immigrant families and their relatives in their home countries.</p>
<p>Today in Toronto Kay Bisnah, President of ACORN International, also unveiled an extensive report underpinning the campaign called <em>Past Time for Remittance Justice </em>(a copy is available at <a href="http://www.remittancejustice.org/">www.remittancejustice.org</a> or <a href="http://www.acorninternational.org/">www.acorninternational.org</a>). The report is the result of  months of work and research by a multi-national research team including a battery of student interns with ACORN International at George Brown College in Toronto as well other researchers in Baltimore, Little Rock, and New Orleans joined with ACORN International and its federated organizations and staff in Latin America, Africa, and Asia.  In a survey of costs focusing on major global banking institutions as well as Western Union and MoneyGram, ACORN International found that the costs are exorbitant and predatory and averaged more than double what the World Bank estimates current pricing.</p>
<p>President Bisnah is expected to ask Toronto Dominion at the release today in Toronto to set an early meeting with representatives of the organization in order to begin discussions on how remittance justice can be achieved as quickly as possible.  Members of ACORN Canada will be demanding similar meetings with HSBC at the Canadian headquarters of the bank in Vancouver, while members in Ottawa will be pressing the Bank of Montreal for a meeting as soon as one can be scheduled.   In Ottawa demands are also going to be made for Canadian regulators to take up the issue of remittances and begin creating a mandatory and effective system.</p>
<p>The grid in the report shows costs can in some cases suck out almost half of the money being sent to families in home countries by as much as one dollar for every dollar being transmitted.  In few cases were charges, commissions, and exchange rates taking less than twenty-five cents on the dollar.  The report calls into question World Bank estimates of an average 10% cost factor and while adopting the World Bank goal of no more than 5% costs, ACORN International calls for the changes to be immediate and comprehensive, including both sending and receiving fees.</p>
<p>Remittances are huge and involve an estimate of over $430 billion with 75% going from developed countries like Canada and the United States to developing countries.  Remittances are a substantial part of the gross national product (GNP) for many of the poorer countries and populations in the world.</p>
<p>ACORN International indicated that in coming weeks more banks will be targeted.  Beginning next week the demands will spread first to Lima, Mexico City, Buenos Aires, San Pedro Sula, Tegucigalpa, and Santiago (Dominican Republic) as well as Nairboi, Kenya and Mumbai, Delhi, and Bangalore in India.  ACORN International also intends to release the report and press demands with major banks headquartered in the United States, United Kingdom and elsewhere, as well as demand government accountability in the same locations.</p>
<p>The sum of remittances dwarfs all other forms of foreign aid and foreign direct investment in developing countries.  A reduction from a 10% average transaction cost to a 5% average would move more than $20 billion in remittances to aid families.  ACORN International believes there is nothing to justify existing charges, and seeks in the Remittance Justice Campaign to push charges to real and reasonable costs rather than the current global “highway” robbery of banks and transfer companies.</p>
<p>No doubt there will be a lot more to come, since these are big targets and this is a lot of money, but there is no question that justice must be come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/12/06/acorn-international-launches-remittance-justice-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santa Barbara Finally Pulls Up Short</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/12/26/santa-barbara-finally-pulls-up-short/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/12/26/santa-barbara-finally-pulls-up-short/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 23:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EITC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goldman sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H&R Block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackson Hewitt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty Tax Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Officer of the Controller of the Currency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Capital Bancorp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predatory lending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RALs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refund Anticipation Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Barbara Bank and Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tony Rossi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working families]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Quepos            It was an extra present under the palm tree to read in the pre-dawn that Santa Barbara Bank &#38; Trust was being pulled out of the business of factoring RALs, predatory refund anticipation loan for Jackson &#38; Hewitt and other companies in the viciously competitive tax services market for lower  income and working families.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2603" title="jackson hewitt logo" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/jackson-hewitt.gif" alt="jackson hewitt logo" width="200" height="200" />Quepos            </em>It was an extra present under the palm tree to read in the pre-dawn that Santa Barbara Bank &amp; Trust was being pulled out of the business of factoring RALs, predatory refund anticipation loan for Jackson &amp; Hewitt and other companies in the viciously competitive tax services market for lower  income and working families.  Several years ago direct negotiations with HSBC, previously the largest factor for such loans, had pulled out of the market (which I have discussed in <em>Citizen Wealth </em>at some length) and Chase had been reforming its practices, but Santa Barbara had been the big holdout.</p>
<p>            Partially, it was simply the “one that got away.”  It&#8217;s footprint was smaller with a base in Santa Barbara that was too far away from our groups and members to do much damage.  They had gotten into this predatory business and done very well, but were impervious to the impacts.  What did it matter to their normal customer base  in Santa Barbara after all?</p>
<p><span id="more-2602"></span></p>
<p>            Direct discussions with Jackson &amp; Hewitt, when I was with ACORN, when round-and-round, with J&amp;H always claiming they would not “unilaterally disarm,” but would do so as H&amp;R Block did so and others like Liberty Tax Services.  H&amp;R Block was going to move from HSBC to its own bank.  I&#8217;m not sure if that happened or not.  Liberty was also a big customer for Santa Barbara. </p>
<p>            The actions of OCC and other banking regulators are key here, because the withdrawal of Santa Barbara from this line of lending could finally push RALs out of the market, which would be huge.</p>
<p>            This was the Christmas present report from <em>Bloomberg News:</em></p>
<p> </p>
<p><em>Regulators ordered Santa Barbara Bank &amp; Trust to stop providing the loan money, which covered about 75 percent of Jackson Hewitt’s financial products program, according to a </em><a href="http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1283552/000119312509259772/d8k.htm">regulatory filing</a><em> by Jackson Hewitt.</em></p>
<p><em>Shares of the company, the No. 2 tax preparer behind </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/h_and_r_block_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org">H&amp;R Block</a><em>, dropped $1.34 to $4.50 on Thursday. </em></p>
<p><em>The </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/comptroller_of_the_currency/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Office of the Comptroller of the Currency</a><em> told Santa Barbara Bank &amp; Trust on Dec. 18 that the lender would not receive regulatory approval to originate the refund anticipation loans in 2010, </em><a href="http://www.snl.com/irweblinkx/file.aspx?IID=100652&amp;FID=8796232">according to a statement</a><em> from the bank’s parent, the </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/pacific-capital-bancorp/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Pacific Capital Bancorp.</a><em> </em></p>
<p><em>A bank spokesman, Tony Rossi, said that “the tax refund loan business is a sort of niche business that falls outside of what would be considered core banking operations.” </em></p>
<p><em>The bank signed a nonbinding letter of intent with a </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/p/private_equity/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier">private equity</a><em> firm to sell the tax business, the statement said.</em></p>
<p><em>Tax preparers are locked in a battle for customers, with Jackson Hewitt vowing this month to regain market share from H&amp;R Block. Firms can attract clients with refund anticipation loans, in which customers who need cash immediately can get a short-term loan, typically lasting a few weeks, that is</em> <em>based on the expected amount of their tax refund.</em></p>
<p><em>Jackson Hewitt, with 6,600 outlets and almost three million clients, has been losing customers to H&amp;R Block and Intuit, which makes TurboTax software. It suspended its dividend in March and has hired </em><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/goldman_sachs_group_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Goldman Sachs</a><em> to explore “strategic alternatives,” language that typically means a company may be sold.</em></p>
<p>            The next target for economic justice reformers and citizen wealth advocates will need to be the unknown “private equity” company that will be tarnishing its reputation and brand – if such a concept is possible in private equity – by buying the Santa Barbara RALs business.  The other target may end up being whomever buys Jackson &amp; Hewitt if Goldman Sachs is able to do the offload.</p>
<p>            You sow what you reap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/12/26/santa-barbara-finally-pulls-up-short/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Following Up On The Back Files</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/11/27/following-up-on-the-back-files/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/11/27/following-up-on-the-back-files/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas and Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebuild New Orleans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[household financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsbc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortality rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sheriff arpaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim DeChristopher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=2472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New Orleans Sometimes it&#8217;s worth returning to our old themes and seeing what has happened to issues we have raised consistently in the past.  We did so yesterday with Sheriff Arpaio who should serve as a rally cry for all who seek justice.  There are some other issues worth remembering briefly:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>◦     Remember Tim DeChristopher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/tim-dechristopher.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2473" title="tim-dechristopher" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/tim-dechristopher-200x141.jpg" alt="tim-dechristopher" width="200" height="141" /></a>New Orleans </em>Sometimes it&#8217;s worth returning to our old themes and seeing what has happened to issues we have raised consistently in the past.  We did so yesterday with Sheriff Arpaio who should serve as a rally cry for all who seek justice.  There are some other issues worth remembering briefly:</p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p>◦     Remember Tim DeChristopher who saved thousands of acres of BLM land on the auction block in Utah by stepping up and putting in bids himself.  This had been a sneak attack auction for oil and gas allocations before the end of the Bush Administration.  Most of the properties DeChristopher challenged have now been pulled by the Obama folks some with scorn.  But, what happened to Tim?  He&#8217;s about to go to trial on on two felon criminal charges of interfering with a federal auction and making false statements on bidding forms. Let no good deed go unpunished, eh?  He&#8217;s hoping to use his day in court to challenge the environmental land policies of the BLM.  Free Tim!</p>
<p><span id="more-2472"></span></p>
<p>◦     We&#8217;ve talked about the charter school hijacking in New Orleans after Katrina.  One of the poster children I brought up was the expropriation of Benjamin Franklin High School (which I attended, as did my daughter), inarguably one of the finest public high schools in the country.  The one school that represented the best work in many ways of the public system in New Orleans and would have been a beacon for rebuilding was seized by a collection of self-interested teachers, administrators, and parents whose primary interest was their own and not the publics.  The issue of racial balance in the school with the rest of the district and elitist concerns about “watering” down the standards were ever present in the background.  Interestingly, Franklin is one of the four schools reported on a list for potential revocation of the charter, because of what seems financial mismanagement issues:  $1M+ in the hole for 2008 and overruns of $500,000 for 2009.  Franklin seems now a case study for why one needs central management and public accountability through elected school board members.</p>
<p>◦     HSBC, the owner of Household International which was one of the big sub-prime operators, used to defend the purchase and management of Household at every turn, but has now admitted that the purchase was a mistake.  Where once Household seemed a foothold for HSBC broadening its reach in the United States, the continuing problems are leading it to refocus on growing markets in Asia and its long presence there as the Hong Kong Shanghai Banking Corporation.  Past CEOs who wouldn&#8217;t listen to the warnings are watching as the current CEO relocates the headquarters and his office from London to China.</p>
<p>◦     Erik Eckholm with the <em>Times </em>notes that infant mortality for African-Americans was finally equalized in Madison, Wisconsin.  Outreach – good old fashion home visits – seem to have made the difference.  When will we learn that we can really fix deep issues by hitting the doors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/11/27/following-up-on-the-back-files/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credit Card Rips</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/11/07/credit-card-rips/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/11/07/credit-card-rips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital one]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debit cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hsbc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=2395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New Orleans There is a lot of talk about reforming credit card fees and rates, but a lot of this seems just that:  talk.  The House Financial Services Committee chaired by Barney Frank has talked about capping rates, but also seems powerless in the wake of many companies (including my own Union Privilege Card offered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/credit-cards_69.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2396" title="credit-cards_69" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/credit-cards_69-200x133.jpg" alt="credit-cards_69" width="200" height="133" /></a>New Orleans </em>There is a lot of talk about reforming credit card fees and rates, but a lot of this seems just that:  talk.  The House Financial Services Committee chaired by Barney Frank has talked about capping rates, but also seems powerless in the wake of many companies (including my own Union Privilege Card offered by HSBC to the best of my knowledge!) raising the fees now <em>ahead</em> of any bill passage.  That’s clearly wrong.</p>
<p>There’s a lot of this hustle-bustle going on.  Floyd Norris made a good point about a month ago in a <em>NY Times </em>column about the poor subsidizing the rich when it comes to credit cards.  Not surprisingly that angle caught my eye immediately.  His point was that even though the stated price for certain items is the same (and required by law to be the same), whether we use cash or a credit card, the poor or working stiff without a credit card is laying down cash, while some of the better off are using a card, which gives the retailer less, and in some cases gives them mileage or credits back.  It’s only gas stations were over my lifetime I’ve seen a real discount for use of cash.  Norris reports, undoubtedly correctly, that the card companies, retailers and others are crying like stuck pigs and wallowing in the water to muddy it up sufficiently that it’s hard for any of us to tell what might be the best reform and whether or not the poor Joe Consumer will get a break.</p>
<p><span id="more-2395"></span></p>
<p>A similar problem seems to be cropping up around debit cards.  I’m new to the debit card world after having heard folks swear by their benefits for years.  A note from the Center for Responsible Lending in North Carolina, which I dearly respect in these matters, recently made the point that the “free” and safer debit card that I for one will admit I used to think protected my young tribals from check overdrafts on sloppy dad-like unbalanced personal accounts.  A lot of the fault here lies in too many folks defaulting to accept so-called “overdraft” protections which are automatically allowing even debit cards to access money not in your personal bank account, and then hitting you for $17 or so for the “pleasure.”  CRL estimated that the average charges are closer to $34 on such a transaction, making it very high interest for a short term loan.</p>
<p>I noticed a similar problem in a weird letter from my current bank, Capital One, where I made the switch because of the way they stepped up to support New Orleans hurricane recovery.  I have a savings type account and a checking type account.  The checkbooks are identical.  I got them at the same time.  There’s no notation on the checks that one is one thing and the other is something different.  I came back from being on the road a month to have a couple of letters saying that I had written more than 5 or 6 checks from the account, and they were letting me know that each future check would involve a fee of about $10 per check.  Getouttahere!  Still nothing in the letter saying which account, but my account number was at the top of their letter.  So, I call with a head of steam asking them WTF?!?  They ask me to read the account number, and it turns out to be that when one checkbook ran out I had picked up a new checkbook, and it had been the one for the savings, rather than the checking.  Are you still with me?  So, I was fuming, but in fairness I quickly grabbed the “right” checks and they had not charged me yet, so there was no harm, no foul (at least I think that until I get the statement!).  What is painful though is that all of this is way too <em>caveat emptor</em> – “buyer beware”  for even me, and tens of millions of others.</p>
<p>We need Congress to stop wheeling and dealing here and really give us some protection against all of these hidden and predatory shell games that are now the rage in modern banking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/11/07/credit-card-rips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

