<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wade Rathke: Chief Organizer Blog &#187; mccarthyism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chieforganizer.org/tag/mccarthyism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chieforganizer.org</link>
	<description>Founder of ACORN, Chief Organizer at ACORN International, Author of Citizen Wealth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:12:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood Sting</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/02/03/planned-parenthood-sting/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/02/03/planned-parenthood-sting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janes O'Keefe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccarthyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing zealots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=4334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Washington There is no such thing as total protection from the “politics of gotcha” in the modern environment of polarized politics. </p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">There is no question that Planned Parenthood has been in the bullseye for years from the zealots and anti-abortion activists.  They [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><em><span style="text-decoration: none;"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4335" title="s-ANTIABORTION-PLANNED-PARENTHOOD-VIDEO-large" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/s-ANTIABORTION-PLANNED-PARENTHOOD-VIDEO-large-200x146.jpg" alt="s-ANTIABORTION-PLANNED-PARENTHOOD-VIDEO-large" width="200" height="146" />Washington </span></em><span style="font-style: normal;"><span style="text-decoration: none;">There is no such thing as total protection from the “politics of gotcha” in the modern environment of polarized politics. </span></span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">There is no question that Planned Parenthood has been in the bullseye for years from the zealots and anti-abortion activists.  They had endured stings in the past, and knew in the wake of the the ACORN pimp-prostitute stings that they needed to be ready for James O&#8217;Keefe or his copycats.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">And from what I know they were ready and on the ball.  From the first visits they seem to have  been monitoring the stingers and sending out red alerts to all of their affiliates to be ready for such subterfuge.  Now from published reports they seem to have known that a dozen of their offices were hit with the similar tales of a<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9Zj9yx2j0Y"> pimp looking for medical help for underage </a>prostitutes.  Planned Parenthood reported the incidents in each case to federal and appropriate authorities.  I&#8217;m not clear that any law was broken in such situations so the reports mainly provide relief for the organization if and when the whole sting becomes public.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">Nonetheless the stingers, who were actors with something called “Live Action,” still managed to get some video of an office manager being way too helpful to these fools.  Kaboom, it&#8217;s on the air.  Slam, she&#8217;s fired and looking for advice on the unemployment line.  Following the script, the stingers claim they have more to come signaling their hopes of creating a pattern of disclosures that were so devastating and unbalancing for ACORN when they were brought down this way.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">I would think that Planned Parenthood did everything “right” organizationally.  Unfortunately, like any large organization with a wide operations in the field, no policy will ever be perfectly followed, people are always going to be inappropriately helpful in human encounters, and finally, nobody and nothing is perfect, sad to say.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">Nor does it seem to matter to the zealots.  It is as irrelevant here as it was in the ACORN situation that there was no real illegality or institutional deceit.  The aim is to create optics.  The reality is secondary if not irrelevant.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">And following the ACORN-sting play book, the hope here is to be able to stampede the herd in Congress to cut off all federal funding to Planned Parenthood.  Despite the facts again that such funding is not used for abortion, the zealots want to drive every dollar away and scare donors, which worked superbly in the ACORN sting.  It didn&#8217;t matter if ACORN wasn&#8217;t getting any federal money, the Issa list of 300 odd corporations connected to the ACORN family was (and is) still being used as a excuse to not fund and deny contracts to unrelated entities in fear of the new McCarthyism in the land.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">Sad state of affairs.  Ironically, the very shadow of the ACORN sting may be what saves Planned Parenthood and other future targets of such stings.  The delayed reaction that not only was ACORN burned but so was a sleepy press and an unsuspecting public has made people and politicians slightly more skeptical of the zealots gotcha games.  O&#8217;Keefe&#8217;s exploits have besmirched such tactics whether with ACORN or the head scratching weirdness with Senator Mary Landrieu&#8217;s office.  The stingers are even forced to claim they have disassociated themselves with the prototype models for their own tactics.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; text-decoration: none;">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in; font-style: normal; text-decoration: none;">We can only hope that despite these kinds of efforts and the cowardice of the press and politicians in dealing with them so often, the fact that you can fool some of the people some of the time, still does not mean that you can fool the same people all of the time.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/02/03/planned-parenthood-sting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Clooney, McCarthy, and Commie Terrorists</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/01/15/george-clooney-mccarthy-and-commie-terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/01/15/george-clooney-mccarthy-and-commie-terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 17:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas and Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aclu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Clooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iww]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccarthyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[murrow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=4249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New Orleans In these politically cold, hard, and unsettled times, I took advantage of my new love affair with my library card to try and gain some perspective, maybe even insights, into the McCarthy Era that ravished the American politics, liberals, and the left in the 1950’s by ordering up “Good Night and Good Luck” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/edward-murrow.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4250" title="edward-murrow" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/edward-murrow-200x247.jpg" alt="edward-murrow" width="200" height="247" /></a>New Orleans </em>In these politically cold, hard, and unsettled times, I took advantage of my new love affair with my library card to try and gain some perspective, maybe even insights, into the McCarthy Era that ravished the American politics, liberals, and the left in the 1950’s by ordering up “Good Night and Good Luck” a story of Edward R. Murrow, the celebrated media commentator, directed by huge movie star hunk, George Clooney in 2005.  I had missed the movie at the theaters, and was surprised at how well done it was, regardless of how many parts fact or fiction, since it is still a movie after all, not a documentary.</p>
<p>There were a lot of recognizable faces besides Clooney including Robert Downey, who always adds something to the mix.  Murrow was played by David Strathairn, who was ahead of me at Williams as I was passing through, and Patricia Clarkson from New Orleans the daughter of one of our Councilwomen.</p>
<p>In the early days of television when news still mattered and commanded an audience, those were different times and Murrow had come to the screen with his name and legacy already writ large from his wartime radio broadcasts.  The movie dates the turnaround, perhaps more symbolically than factually, with a down-the-line Air Force civilian employee in Michigan being pushed out of his job because of a sealed envelope filled with unknown evidence and charges, but provoking enough fear of red Commie taint.  Murrow, as this story goes, picked the piece up out of the back pages of a paper and highlighted the story provoking Senator McCarthy’s attack at him personally.  Now the attacks are shotgun blasts at the high and mighty as well as virtually anyone committed to working for change.</p>
<p>McCarthy in footage from the time accuses Murrow of having been a member of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), a radical, syndicalist union, broken by the Espionage Act in WWI.  Other vintage footage includes McCarthy’s repeated assertions that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) was included on numerous official lists of “subversive” organizations serving as fronts for the Communist Party.  None of which was true and all of which were denied.   A low level African-American civilian employee is wildly accused of having infiltrated the “code” room despite her denials of ever having been there or done anything but transmit messages as directed without any knowledge of their contents.</p>
<p>Sobering and depressing stuff that made for a great movie, but a miserable look at life in our country.  This week I read a right wing blog that listed me as the “founder of ACORN” and then added gratuitously, “America’s largest terrorist organization.”  Clearly just a blogger, not a US Senator, so proof, presumably not needed, assertion uncontested, another dangerous voice in the thundering herd, hopefully unheard and ignored.  Watching McCarthy smear with the IWW brush, I thought of the poor guy who was an Obama nominee for the federal court and throughout the summer had to defend the fact that 30+ years before he had been a door-to-door fundraising canvasser for a couple of months for ACORN, and now decades later teetered for months on the edge of the knife.  It goes on and on in the right wing witch hunts of bloggers, Beck, and others woven of whole cloth.</p>
<p>A poll in the <em>New York Times, </em>says only about a 30% surveyed believed that wild talk and hate speech contributed to the recent killings in Tucson, and that’s a good thing.  On the other hand the cumulative results of all of these allegations, accusations, <em>ad infinitum, ad nauseum</em> is guaranteed to chill action for change, participation of citizens, and our very democracy, while leaving many afraid of associations and support in fearful isolation.</p>
<p>None of which stops people like me from doing the work, but all of which categorically makes it harder to the do work and to work at the largest scale possible and necessary.</p>
<p>Watching the movie, it was hard not to be reminded that there are now dozens and dozens of McCarthy-wannabes, but very, very few Edward R. Murrow’s.  George Clooney could make another, more contemporary movie in America now.  The problem is that he probably can’t find enough effective heroes today, and with the new wave of Congressional investigations promised and coming, few lessons seem to have been learned from the McCarthy moments more than 50 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2011/01/15/george-clooney-mccarthy-and-commie-terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressman Issa:  Preparing for the New McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/10/31/congressman-issa-preparing-for-the-new-mccarthy/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/10/31/congressman-issa-preparing-for-the-new-mccarthy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darryl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darryl Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCarthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccarthyism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=3884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p class="wp-caption-text">Witch hunt</p>
<p>New Orleans If, as it seems increasingly likely, the Republicans take over the House of Representatives in the coming week, it is not too early to prepare for the coming contentiousness and partisan, political baiting that will accompany the new McCarthyism in the House Investigations Committee when Congressman Darryl Issa (R-CA) takes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> </em></p>
<div id="attachment_3885" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><em><em><img class="size-full wp-image-3885 " title="images" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/images1.jpg" alt="Witch hunt" width="200" height="200" /></em></em><p class="wp-caption-text">Witch hunt</p></div>
<p><em>New Orleans </em>If, as it seems increasingly likely, the Republicans take over the House of Representatives in the coming week, it is not too early to prepare for the coming contentiousness and partisan, political baiting that will accompany the new McCarthyism in the House Investigations Committee when Congressman Darryl Issa (R-CA) takes over next year.  Be prepared for the Washington equivalent of the Salem witch trials and the McCarthy commie witch hunts.  I know I’m already talking to lawyers about strategy and advice, because I’ve read enough of Issa’s so-called investigations he released as minority reports over the last several years, to understand fully that these “investigations” are simply long press releases whose dearth of any factual basis makes them read like the bad fictions that they are.</p>
<p>One report built a castle in the air from the firm foundation that ACORN was a tax-exempt, 501c3 organization and therefore had violated a host of rules and regulations about filings and formalities deserving of total scorn, condemnation, and confiscation.  Of course ACORN was never a tax exempt, 501c3, yet that simple piece of research seems to have totally eluded the Issa and his so-called investigators in their rush to burn and torture the organization.</p>
<p>Another report that still sends shivers in the wake of many big and upstanding organizations seemed mainly focused on the fact that the legal department contracted with ACORN did the corporate filings out of the headquarters address of the corporation in New Orleans.  I’ve even been told by major unions with hundreds of thousands of members that they were uncomfortable doing business with any of the 300 odd corporations that Issa had listed in the report in a classic example of “guilt by association.”  For the life of me I’m uncertain where the “guilt” might have been regardless of the “association.”  What large enterprise doesn’t separately incorporate property holdings to segregate liabilities?  What housing operation doesn’t separately incorporate its various housing development properties and projects?  And, these were the bulk of the corporations and the filings, not that the facts would have mattered to Issa and the conspiracy theorists he employed as “investigators.”  If there were justice, once anointed he could start with Citi or Bank of America and sort through their thousands of corporate entities first, which might keep him busy for years as he looks for “criminal conspiracies.”</p>
<p>Given that so much of the hard core Republican base still believes that ACORN “stole” the election for Obama in 2008, maybe this will be his media strategy for an early headline ramp-up as he takes full command of the House Investigations Committee.  After all the Issa motto seems to be:  if we want to say it, it must be true, so who needs the facts anyway?</p>
<p>Have motto, then the sloppy methodology must follow.  How much of what is left of the progressive movement will he try to silence and chill with such antics?</p>
<p>People get ready!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2010/10/31/congressman-issa-preparing-for-the-new-mccarthy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Leveraged on Heath Care</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/09/29/getting-leveraged-on-heath-care/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/09/29/getting-leveraged-on-heath-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccarthyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Gaspard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=2249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> Washington Everywhere I go in Washington, just like the rest of the country, but more intensely, the discussion is about health care reform and whether there’s any chance of pulling through anything at this point that would really be reform.  Disturbingly, it seems the White House and the Congressional leadership is getting leveraged by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/braveman.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2250" title="braveman" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/braveman-199x298.jpg" alt="braveman" width="199" height="298" /></a> Washington </em>Everywhere I go in Washington, just like the rest of the country, but more intensely, the discussion is about health care reform and whether there’s any chance of pulling through anything at this point that would really be reform.  Disturbingly, it seems the White House and the Congressional leadership is getting leveraged by narrow interests and having difficulty focusing on the meat and merits of reform.</p>
<p>A promise to Senator Baucus around revenue has led to a taxing problem on so-called “Cadillac” benefits, but voices from Rich Trumka at the AFL-CIO and many others are point out that the tax would go to fairly thin programs including a lot of plans that are part of collective bargaining agreements.</p>
<p>There now seems a cadre of folks in the House and a smaller number in the Senate who are trying to hijack the bill based on stripping out abortion and taking a promise from the President as part of the license to do so.  Are we now throwing women under the bus as well?</p>
<p>The <em>Times </em>reported that some states, led by Arizona, are trying to act unilaterally to say that the state could “veto” an “individual mandate” that might come with a federal package.</p>
<p>The tactics seem to be overwhelming the strategy.  This is not a debate but a dog pile it seems.  Where’s the adult supervision?</p>
<p><em>Postscript!</em></p>
<p><em> My “friends” on the right seem to be using me as a source for an attack at yet another new target:  Patrick Gaspard, political director at the White House.</em></p>
<p><span id="more-2249"></span></p>
<p><em>I have huge admiration for Patrick and have enjoyed my dealings with him over the years.  In almost 1400 blogs I’ve done, sometimes I don’t get it right, call it a senior moment or whatever it might be, but reading the blogsphere with me as a source took me back searching for whether or not I could be causing a problem here inadvertently.  Patrick was never on the staff of ACORN.  I double checked with people I still know there, and it appears that I dropped a stitch there.  Hopefully my misstatement won’t lead to the White House throwing him in front of the bus in this rush to neo-McCarthyism that has become so prominent. In this case, my memory tricked me.  I’m glad to carry the weight and simply say I made a mistake, and damned if I’m not sorry and hope no damage is done to a good man doing a hard job. </em></p>
<p><em>Let me quickly add, since I read Google alerts and have noticed that there is a attack squad at all manner of friends and associates I have had over the years, that for the formal record, I have NO friends.  If there’s a problem with me, then bring it on, but for the rest of you, if you see me on the street, just nod and pass on by, if you are worried about it.  Until we learn to all stand together and oppose this kind of blood sport political targeting, it’s going to be like this for a while.  I’m just not sure how long it will take.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/09/29/getting-leveraged-on-heath-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constitutional Defenders</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/09/20/constitutional-defenders/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/09/20/constitutional-defenders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Town Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mccarthyism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nadler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=2212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> New Orleans Having been in Canada all week was a relief, but there was no way to come back to New Orleans and not try to get a better understanding of the political road rage that is seeking to engulf ACORN and attack governmental funding sources.  Two things interested me first.  The first was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> <a href="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/nadler.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2213" title="nadler" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/nadler-200x138.jpg" alt="nadler" width="200" height="138" /></a>New Orleans </em>Having been in Canada all week was a relief, but there was no way to come back to New Orleans and not try to get a better understanding of the political road rage that is seeking to engulf ACORN and attack governmental funding sources.  Two things interested me first.  The first was the statements by Congressman Jerrold Nadler from New York, who is the head of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, who raised the point that the anti-ACORN bills were “bills of attainer” and flatly unconstitutional.  The other was my curiosity to see which elected officials could not be herded by the mob, since those are names with honoring with some respect and thanks in my book.</p>
<p>Since no one much seems to be looking at this severe outbreak of McCarthyism, I’m going to paste in Nadler’s press release and let him speak for himself:</p>
<p><span id="more-2212"></span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today,   Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Chair of the Judiciary Subcommittee on the   Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, denounced a Republican   Amendment adopted by the House of Representatives to deny all federal funds   to ACORN as blatantly unconstitutional and a threat to unpopular   organizations everywhere. The Republican initiative, entitled the Defund   ACORN Act, singles out a specific organization by name for exclusion from   participating in any federal program, in direct violation of the   Constitution’s prohibition against Bills of Attainder.</p>
<p>“Today’s Republican Amendment is   in blatant violation of the Constitution’s prohibition against Bills of   Attainder,” said Nadler. “Congress must not be in the business of punishing   individual organizations or people without trial, and that’s what this   Amendment does. Whatever one may think of an organization, the Constitution’s   clear ban on Bills of Attainder is there for the protection of all of our   liberties.”</p>
<p>The Supreme Court, in decisions   dating back to the Civil War era, has held that the Constitution prohibits   all legislative acts, “no matter what their form, that apply either to named   individuals or to easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to   inflict punishment on them without a judicial trial….” During the McCarthy   era, for example, Congress enacted legislation prohibiting the use of funds   to pay the salaries of three federal employees who Congress deemed   subversive. The Supreme Court ruled this legislation unconstitutional as a   Bill of Attainder.</p>
<p>This Amendment, in addition to   being clearly unconstitutional, sets a dangerous precedent of Congress   punishing politically disfavored groups without any due process.</p>
<p>As Chair of the Judiciary   Subcommittee charged with defending the Constitution, Nadler spoke out on the   House floor against the Republican Amendment, delivering the following   statement:</p>
<p>“Thank you, Mr. Speaker. A little   while ago, the House passed an amendment to the bill that we were considering   that says no contract or federal funds may ever go to ACORN, a named   organization, or to any individual or organization affiliated with ACORN.   Unfortunately, this was done in the spirit of the moment and nobody had the   opportunity to point out that this is a flat violation of the Constitution,   constituting a Bill of Attainder. The Constitution says that Congress shall   never pass a Bill of Attainder. Bills of Attainder, no matter what their   form, apply either to a named individual or to easily ascertainable members   of a group, to inflict punishment. That’s exactly what this amendment does.</p>
<p>“It may be that ACORN is guilty of   various infractions, and, if so, it ought to be vetted, or maybe sanctioned,   by the appropriate administrative agency or by the judiciary. Congress must   not be in the business of punishing individual organizations or people   without trial.</p>
<p>“That’s what this Amendment did.   It is flatly prohibited by the Constitution, and once we ignore the   Constitution we ignore constitutional principles. Whatever one may think of   the subject matter or the organization, the Constitution and the ban on Bills   of Attainder are there for the protection of all of our liberties. It is   unfortunate that we passed this, and I hope it is removed in the conference   committee.”</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>I like the fact that Congressman Nadler is looking for a way to kill this bill in conference where calmer voices with more concern for the Constitution and its protections of all of our rights, even our rights to take unpopular stands, might prevail.</p>
<p>He may feel lonely, but he’s not by himself in wondering how this could happen.  A blog site from Florida on politics (<a href="http://www.postonpolitics.com/">www.postonpolitics.com</a>) added another lone voice that I couldn’t miss:</p>
<p>“A bill of attainder, forbidden in Article I, Section IX of the constitution, is a legislative act that imposes punishment on a specific person or group without a trial or hearing. But there’s legal precendent allowing a law that singles out an entity if “the law under challenge, viewed in terms of the type and severity of burdens imposed, reasonably can be said to further nonpunitive legislative purposes.”</p>
<p><a href="http://volokh.com/posts/1253048051.shtml">UCLA law professor and blogger Eugene Volokh offers this discussion</a> of the matter and concludes: “My rereading of the precedents leads me to confidently and unambiguously say, ‘I don’t know.’ “</p>
<p><strong> </strong><strong>The clamoring herd of sheep in Congress driven only by politics and their mood of the moment…hey, am I wrong, weren’t conservatives always the ones saying they wanted to “protect the Constitution”…is doing their wild thing, but here’s a list of Congressmen and Senators who stood up for the Constitution and therefore became ACORN’s defenders in this tar and feathering exercise.</strong></p>
<p><strong>ACORN&#8217;s defenders in the Congressional House of Representatives</strong></p>
<p>Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisc.<br />
Xavier Becerra, D-Calif.<br />
Robert Brady D-Pa.<br />
Corrine Brown, D-Fla.<br />
G.K. Butterfield, D-N.C.<br />
Mike Capuano, D-Mass.<br />
Andre Carson, D-Ind.<br />
Kathy Castor, D-Fla.<br />
Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo.<br />
James Clyburn, D-S.C.<br />
Joseph Crowley, D-N.Y.<br />
Elijah Cummings, D-Md.<br />
Danny Davis, D-Ill.<br />
Diane DeGette, D-Colo.<br />
Bill Delahunt, D-Mass.<br />
Mike Doyle, D-Pa.<br />
Donna Edwards, D-Md.<br />
Keith Ellison, D-Minn.<br />
Eliot Engel, D-N.Y.<br />
Chaka Fattah, D-Pa.<br />
Bob Filner, D-Calif.<br />
Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio<br />
Al Green, D-Tex.<br />
Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz.<br />
Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y.<br />
Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii<br />
Rush Holt, D-N.J.<br />
Mike Honda, D-Calif.<br />
Jesse Jackson, Jr. D-Ill.<br />
Sheila Jackson-Lee, D-Tex.<br />
Eddie Bernice Johnson, D-Tex.<br />
Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick, D-Mich.<br />
Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio<br />
Rick Larsen, D-Wash.<br />
Barbara Lee, D-Calif.<br />
John Lewis, D-Ga.<br />
Stephen Lynch, D-Mass.<br />
Markey, D-Mass.<br />
Betty McCollum, D-Minn.<br />
McDermott, D-Wash.<br />
McGovern, D-Mass.<br />
Gregory Meeks, D-N.Y.<br />
Alan Mollohan, D-W.Va.<br />
Gwen Moore, D-Wisc.<br />
Jim Moran, D-Va.<br />
Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.<br />
Richard Neal, D-Mass.<br />
John Olver, D-Mass.<br />
Frank Pallone, D-N.J.<br />
Bill Pascrell, D-N.J.<br />
Donald Payne, D-N.J.<br />
Jared Polis, D-Colo.<br />
David Price, D-N.C.<br />
Nick Rahall, D-W.Va.<br />
Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.<br />
Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif.<br />
Bobby Rush, D-Ill.<br />
Linda Sánchez, D-Calif.<br />
Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill.<br />
David Scott D-Ga.<br />
Bobby Scott, D-Va.<br />
Jose Serrano, D-N.Y.<br />
Brad Sherman, D-Calif.<br />
Albio Sires, D-N.J.<br />
Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y.<br />
Pete Stark, D-Calif.<br />
Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.<br />
Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y.<br />
Niki Tsongas, D-Mass.<br />
Nydia Velázquez, D-N.Y.<br />
Maxine Waters, D-Calif.<br />
Diane Watson, D-Calif.<br />
Henry Waxman, D-Calif.<br />
Robert Wexler, D-Fla.<br />
Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif.</p>
<p><strong>ACORN Defenders in the United States Senate</strong></p>
<p>Roland Burris from Illinois;</p>
<p>Robert Casey Jr. from Pennsylvania</p>
<p>Richard Durbin from Illinois</p>
<p>Kirsten Gillibrand from New York</p>
<p>Patrick Leahy from Vermont</p>
<p>Bernie Sanders from Vermont</p>
<p>Whitehouse from Rhode Island.</p>
<p>Daniel Akaka from Hawaii</p>
<p>Jeff Bingamen from New Mexico</p>
<p>Diane Feinstein from California</p>
<p>Tom Harkin from Iowa</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/09/20/constitutional-defenders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

