<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wade Rathke: Chief Organizer Blog &#187; wages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chieforganizer.org/tag/wages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chieforganizer.org</link>
	<description>Author of Citizen Wealth: Winning the Campaign to Save Working Families</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stealing from Poor Workers</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/09/02/stealing-from-poor-workers/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/09/02/stealing-from-poor-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruth milkman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ucla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/?p=2132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Baltimore Ruth Milkman of UCLA and Nik Theodore of University of Illinois, Chicago are top researchers and obviously savvy enough to put out their study, Broken Promises, Unprotected Workers, as an exclusive to Steve Greenhouse at the Times to get maximum attention to their summary of surveys from over 4000 workers in 2008 which indicates [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ruth-milkman.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2133" title="ruth-milkman" src="http://chieforganizer.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/ruth-milkman-200x135.jpg" alt="ruth-milkman" width="200" height="135" /></a>Baltimore </em>Ruth Milkman of UCLA and Nik Theodore of University of Illinois, Chicago are top researchers and obviously savvy enough to put out their study, <em>Broken Promises, Unprotected Workers, </em>as an exclusive to Steve Greenhouse at the <em>Times </em>to get maximum attention to their summary of surveys from over 4000 workers in 2008 which indicates that wage theft from workers is simply routine.  I wish this was a surprise, but of course it is not.  The whole report is probably timed to Labor Day.  Hopefully, Russell Sage Foundation which financed the report will say something more than “low wage workers are hard to find,” which was such a preposterous comment that I found myself laughing in the pre-dawn while I read the highlights.</p>
<p><span id="more-2132"></span></p>
<p>The bullet points though are riveting:</p>
<ul>
<li>“… a typical worker had lost $51 the previous week through wage violations, out of average weekly earnings of $339. That translates into a 15 percent loss in pay.”</li>
<li>“Only 8 percent of those who suffered serious injuries on the job filed for compensation to pay for medical care and missed days at work stemming from those injuries.”</li>
<li>“…26 percent of the workers had been paid less than the minimum wage the week before being surveyed…”</li>
<li>“… one in seven had worked off the clock the previous week.”</li>
<li> “…76 percent of those who had worked overtime the week before were not paid their proper overtime…”</li>
<li>“Of workers who receive tips, 12 percent said their employer had stolen some of the tips.”</li>
<li>“One in five workers reported having lodged a complaint about wages to their employer or trying to form a union in the previous year…”</li>
<li>“…43 percent of them said they had experienced some form of illegal retaliation, like firing or suspension….”</li>
</ul>
<p>So, even with just the headlines and without reading the unreleased report, the “news” is clear:  low wage workers are robbed when well and when hurt by being paid less than the minimum wage, wrong overtime, and off the clock, but they are not passive and a significant minority are willing to stand up and do something, but almost half are brutalized on the job by intimidation tactics and slap down retaliations.</p>
<p>The DOL Secretary says she’s hiring 200 more Wage and Hour inspectors, but clearly that is inadequate after years of neglect, and there has been no reform of labor laws yet, so pretty much today is another day in the working life and the unwritten law for many businesses is that this just means it is another good day to steal from their own workers without much of a fear in the world that justice will be done.</p>
<p>America, what a country!</p>
<p>Last night at a <em>Citizen Wealth </em>event at SEIU 1199 in Baltimore a wage inspector for the State of Maryland asked me what did I know about innovative programs in other states being undertaken to enforce labor laws.  I had to answer essentially, “nothing, brother,” you are one of the few and not the many.  Today’s highlights on this report indicate that he is even more alone that I feared.</p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F09%2F02%2Fstealing-from-poor-workers%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F09%2F02%2Fstealing-from-poor-workers%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/09/02/stealing-from-poor-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employee Free Choice Compromises</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/05/09/employee-free-choice-compromises/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/05/09/employee-free-choice-compromises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Free Choice Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor Organizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WARN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EFCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/wp/?p=1304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>St. Petersburg    Meeting with the WARN (Worker Action and Research Network) staff yesterday in St. Pete, we found ourselves talking about Wal-Mart and the organizing challenge represented by huge retail employers like W-M in the US and Canada.  All of which brings up the daunting issue of labor law reform and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>St. Petersburg    Meeting with the WARN (Worker Action and Research Network) staff yesterday in St. Pete, we found ourselves talking about Wal-Mart and the organizing challenge represented by huge retail employers like W-M in the US and Canada.  All of which brings up the daunting issue of labor law reform and the imbalance now that favors such companies over workers and unions in such a woeful fashion.</p>
<p>    The papers were full of reports of possible compromises looking for a way to secure a vote here or there.  Some of it was patently absurd.  Workers just can’t seem to catch a break!</p>
<p><span id="more-1304"></span></p>
<p>    Good example:  Chamber of Commerce.  One story, I think by the Times’ Greenhouse said the Chamber was demanding 45 days between filing and an election – heck, the average now is less than than I think!  These folks are obviously just obfuscating.</p>
<p>    There is talk about “quick” elections in the 21 day or 3 week range, which would be about half the average now.  Anything might be better than what we have, but one world of hurt can be administered to workers in 3 weeks by these lawyer and consultant goons, so it’s unclear whether that will solve the problem or any real problem at all?</p>
<p>    Senator Diane Feinstein from California seemed to be shopping a compromise that would forego elections if a majority of workers mailed in their signed cards to the NLRB for cross checking.  Frankly, that’s a hard one for me to follow.   A business might want to challenge the demand for recognition if it is presented to the labor board, but would not if it were mailed to the labor board?  Would the future rely on constant litigation trying to prove whether a worker personally went to the mailbox or had a friend or their local union representative go to the mailbox for them?  Huh?  </p>
<p>    Why all of the grabbing at straws?  This is broken.  Fix it!</p>
<p><img src="http://www.chieforganizer.org/uploads/pics/diane.jpeg" alt="Dianne Fienstein" /></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F05%2F09%2Femployee-free-choice-compromises%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F05%2F09%2Femployee-free-choice-compromises%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/05/09/employee-free-choice-compromises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citizen Wealth: Increasing Access for Participation</title>
		<link>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/05/09/citizen-wealth-increasing-access-for-participation/</link>
		<comments>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/05/09/citizen-wealth-increasing-access-for-participation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 19:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jstuart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideas and Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WalMart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal-mart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chieforganizer.org/wp/?p=1302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New Orleans         Once one gets past the ideological opposition some have towards eligible citizens gaining full access to all of the income supports available, we are still faced with the cost of infrastructure and the capacity to enroll the vast numbers who are unserved. </p>
<p>In my book, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Orleans         Once one gets past the ideological opposition some have towards eligible citizens gaining full access to all of the income supports available, we are still faced with the cost of infrastructure and the capacity to enroll the vast numbers who are unserved. </p>
<p>In my book, <a href="http://www.amazon.ca/Citizen-Wealth-Winning-Campaign-Families/dp/1576758621/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;s=books&#038;qid=1241374810&#038;sr=8-1">Citizen Wealth</a>, coming out soon I argue that we need to approach technology differently and increase access to easier filing and certification. I also argue that we need to enlist the vast array of private establishments where eligible citizens congregate in the effort to achieve maximum eligible participation. I even confront the heresy of utilizing Wal-Mart for such purposes, which is surely an indication of our deadly serious I see this mission. </p>
<p><span id="more-1302"></span></p>
<p>For all of these reasons I was struck by an article in The Guardian offering sure proof that when a government in this case Britain wants to achieve some result and wants to do so efficiently, then it is not so difficult to offer such services through all available outlets, and even allow the piper to be paid for the tune. We need to go somewhere near there in order to make the application process ubiquitous, accessible, and easy, the outreach huge and effective, and reduce the government’s role to final verification and certification. </p>
<p>This story from the UK is about identity cards, and that is probably a controversial issue in the UK, as it would be here, but nonetheless, it is not a big leap to imagine out we could create a network to move eligible lower income families to easier access to benefits. Jacqui Smith enlists high street help for ID cards scheme Alan Travis, home affairs editor The Guardian, Wednesday 6 May 2009 High street chemists, post offices and photo shops are to be used to record the electronic fingerprints and other biometric data needed for the national identity card scheme, the home secretary, Jacqui Smith, is to announce today. The decision to use high street shops sidesteps the need for the Home Office to set up a network of enrolment centres with mobile units to operate in rural areas. The move comes as the latest Home Office report to parliament on the costs of the scheme show they have risen by a further £221m to a total of £5.3bn over the next 10 years. That figure excludes the costs to other government departments and agencies of scanners and other equipment for verifying the identity of those trying to access public services. The home secretary is to confirm in a speech today that Manchester will be the first city where citizens – particularly younger people – will be invited to apply for an ID card from this autumn before the national roll-out in 2012. They will be charged £30 for a standalone card that will be valid for travel through Europe. Britain&#8217;s commercial airline pilots are meeting MPs and ministers to object to an initial scheme requiring 20,000 airside workers at Manchester and London City airports to sign up to the ID card scheme as a condition of employment. Smith is to meet businesses today who are keen to sign up with the Identity and Passport Service to undertake the work of recording electronic fingerprints and facial photographs for those who apply for ID cards or a new generation passport. The Home Office expects more than 12m such documents to be issued each year when the scheme is fully operational. &#8220;While private companies will clearly benefit from the increased footfall from offering this service, their customers will benefit from being able to quickly provide their biometrics while they are out doing their shopping,&#8221; said Smith. The Post Office, the National Pharmacy Association and the Photo Marketing Association are all in talks with the Home Office over the contract. The cost report puts the figure for issuing ID cards to British and Irish citizens in the UK at £4.945bn, and to foreign nationals at £372m. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.chieforganizer.org/uploads/pics/jacqui_smith_07052.jpg" alt="Jacquie Smith" /></p>
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-right: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F05%2F09%2Fcitizen-wealth-increasing-access-for-participation%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fchieforganizer.org%2F2009%2F05%2F09%2Fcitizen-wealth-increasing-access-for-participation%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://chieforganizer.org/2009/05/09/citizen-wealth-increasing-access-for-participation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
