Hiding Real Estate Ownership from Tenants and Land Contract Holders

New Orleans   Recently I listened to the presentation of a fine group of graduate students at the School of Social Work at Georgia State University that summarized the results of four months of work in collaboration with the ACORN Home Savers Campaign.  The report indicated the results were mixed.  Our contact and outreach goals were unrealistic.  There were a lot of reasons for that, but one the report didn’t detail, but one that all of them had experienced, was the difficulty of putting the list together of families who were on installment land contracts of various kinds.

They might have gotten cricks in their necks as they nodded in agreement with writers of the Times’ “Upshot” column on “the opaque world of ownership by L.L.Cs.”  The hook on the column was the umbrage that has been expressed by Fox provocateur and wielding right winger, Sean Hannity, about the revelations of his extensive use of LLCs or limited liability corporations first in The Guardian and now more generally.  Property ownership and tax records are supposed to be public, so you might wonder what’s the beef?  The use of LLCs was designed to provide exactly what the name says, limited liability, for property holders from external threats.  We were amused when the conservative Congressional yahoos were attacking ACORN for the number of corporate entities that were part of the ACORN family of organizations, since so many of them were separate building entities or property-based LLCs that are standard in all business, nonprofit or profit based.  Hannity seems to believe everything about property ownership should be private and obscure, and real estate markets in New York City and London are well known playgrounds for hidden transfers of the rich and corrupt from around the globe.

At the same time Upshot joined the wailing wall of the GSU students and many of the volunteer army of researchers that have worked to create the doorknocking lists for ACORN Home Savers Campaign by unraveling property records, especially given the propensity of all of these kinds of companies to not register their holdings.  Upshot seemed to be looking over our shoulder in places like Memphis where we found it next to impossible to correctly identify all of the ownership vehicles and properties owned by hedge funds like Apollo and others in the market.

They note that a Harvard doctoral student, Adam Travis, has found that in markets like Milwaukee a quarter of the rental market is held by LLCs.   The downsides are numerous when anyone gets around to looking.  The Hannity’s, superrich, launderers, and mobsters might get upset, but the real victims are lower income tenants-buyers who have no idea who really owns their house behind some address in South Carolina or Texas where they are sending their payments.  Cities that want to hold owners accountable for abandoned or delinquent properties are also stuck with the same problem in finding the real owners behind the shells, some of which have gone under as well.  In Cleveland recently, I listened to a discussion of the problem of foreclosed houses cycling in and out of city control in lower income neighborhoods in sort of a reverse dump by hidden LLC owners when they couldn’t sell or rehab so simply abandoned properties back to the city housing list.

As Times’ reporter Emily Badger summarizes, “it is no easy thing to get a faceless company to court.”  As we have found, it is even harder for a tenant or an owner-occupant to hold such a deed holder or landlord accountable.  A city’s exasperation should be matched by a commitment to fix the problem, not a rationale for how hard it is to help its citizens get a small modicum of justice in the housing market.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Terrible Idea of the Day: Evict Public Housing Tenants!

New Orleans     Almost everyone else in America knows that we have a national affordable housing crisis.  Maybe someone in Washington could take a minute out of their day pop by or send an email to Dr. Ben Carson, the head of Trump’s Housing and Urban Development (HUD) operation responsible for housing and give him a clue about the housing dilemma facing lower income families that is his responsibility by law.

Not having a clue, Carson is now proposing to take several draconian steps to punish the poor in public housing.  On one hand he is trying to time-limit public housing so that it is a temporary benefit rather than long term based on income.  This proposal affects millions of low income families.  Work requirements would be part of the package.  On the other hand, Carson wants to triple the rents of the poorest of the families in public housing or benefiting from section 8 housing support vouchers in private housing by raising the minimum rent from $50 to $150 over a period of time.  This proposal over time would hurt 750,000 people according to HUD.

I have to wonder where Carson and HUD, along with their governmental pushers and enablers, think that people will go if they are priced or timed out of public housing? Perhaps the streets?  No, that wouldn’t work.  The rich and politicians don’t like vast and increasing numbers of homeless on the streets.  The only thing certain is that they will hope and pray that the poor are invisible to them, which seems the only policy that has their full commitment.  But, wait, I must be pretending that they care about the consequences of these policies rather than allowing them to be purely vindictive.  My bad!

The puppet master for this proposal now being mouthed by Carson seems to be budget director Mick Mulvaney.  Yes, Mick Mulvaney, the same public servant who is doing double duty trying to destroy the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.  He rivals President Trump these days in dominating the news cycle.  Today he was not only trying to destroy public housing supports, but he was also trying to block public access to the CFPB’s popular database of complaints from consumers.  Even better he was revealing his “pay to play” policy while he was a congressman by meeting with lobbyists first and foremost if they had donated to his campaign.  He offered this obvious insight to a group of bankers about why they needed to put more dollars into buying other congressmen if they wanted to gut the CFPB and Dodd-Frank.

There’s a lesson here of course.  After decades of dismantling public housing, millions stuck on waiting lists around the country for section 8 vouchers which are not an entitlement, the crash of the real estate construction market after the housing speculation bubble burst, the creation of the credit desert and slowdown of construction financing for affordable housing, rising rents and record eviction rates, the problem turns out to be that these damn poor people didn’t pool enough money and food stamps together to pay lobbyists and bribe politicians like Mulvaney with campaign contributions.

Darned, why didn’t we think of that!

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail