Stiglitz Opposes India FDI Modifications, Walmart Admits Knowledge of Bribes

Professor Joseph Stiglitz

New Orleans    Talking to ACORN India’s Mumbai Director Vinod Shetty via Skype on Tuesday, he could hardly wait to tell me about the news headlines all over the country as Nobel prize winning, former World Bank economist Joseph Stiglitz added his voice to our longstanding opposition to Prime Minister Singh’s unilateral actions to modify foreign direct investments in multi-brand retail that would allow Walmart and others to come into the country and work their will.  ACORN International’s India FDI Watch Campaign has been an active organizer and voice in this effort for the last 8 years.  Stiglitz, now a Columbia University professor, is the highest profile economist to line up against these new, desperate political moves by the Prime Minister and the ruling Congress Party in advance of coming elections in 2014.

Stiglitz speaking at a media interaction on this week in Bangalore, organized by the Azim Premji Foundation, Joseph Stiglitz, a professor at the Columbia University, said that the consequences of foreign direct investment in retail would be that it drives down prices received by Indian suppliers to compete with foreign firms, thereby increasing inequality.  Stiglitz was clear about Walmart as well, as is obvious from this excerpt from of his comments:

Citing that foreign investment would bring in more corruption, Stiglitz said that “Don’t focus on FDI in the belief that it will solve all problems.” He also warned the Indian government saying, “Walmart certainly brings greater capacity in bribery, it was their source of success in Mexico. You don’t need to bring that in, you already have enough of that.”  Apprehending that the investment inflow would shift the production bases to outside countries, the Nobel Laureate said, “There is concern in this area that some MNCs (multinational companies) might use their monopsony power, their ability to access cheap goods from China, and use that monopsony power to give them a competitive advantage. That’s not a good basis for growth,” quoted Livemint, a financial newspaper.  [from]

These were not slapdash, off-the-cuff comments made by Stiglitz.  In an interview with Pranay Sharma published as “Unpopular Opinion” on a blogsite,  he was even clearer on October 21, 2012:

PM Manmohan Singh announced a clutch of economic reforms recently, particularly in regard to allowing FDI in multi-brand retail. Do you think India needs to open up its market?

India is an unusual country and different from many other developing and emerging markets. It has a large entrepreneurial class and has lots of savings, wealth. And this entrepreneurial class is very talented. So that raises the question as to why India needs foreign entrepreneurs in any sector, particularly the retail or the financial sectors.

And what’s your answer to that?

I have not seen a good explanation yet. To me, as most economists say, a little competition is good. On the other hand, the worry is that a company like Walmart may owe some of their success to its power and ability to drive down prices. Because they can buy things out and if that’s the case then they will use that power to have Chinese goods displace Indian goods. The real harm will not be to the retail sector. That is not the real problem. The harm will be to the Indian supply chain going into the retail sector. The other concern is that Walmart has succeeded in expanding its business by adopting abusive labour relations.

Is that the experience of other countries where it has a presence?

That is the experience of other countries. It is a business practice that you don’t want to import to your country. Bribery in Mexico, free-riding on healthcare, a policy against unionisation, discrimination against women—a whole range of accusations, some of which have been proved and others that remain accusations but are hard to win in courts. Why would you want to import such business practices into India? Many economists see the breakdown in social contract as one of the reasons for inequality. There is also a worry that Walmart will break down the social contract in India that is already frail.

So how does one go about it?

The other reply to these concerns is for India to have legislations to ensure these problems don’t happen. You should have good protection from large multinationals.

Stiglitz in yet elsewhere has also committed the heresy of questioning the impact on Indian farmers and their sourcing, which has been the one fig leaf the government has been hiding behind.

Meanwhile in the United States two Congressman yesterday released emails from Walmart CEO Duke from 2005 while he was head of Walmart’s international operations (and frequently in India promoting the FDI changes!) proving he and the top officials had knowledge of the Mexico bribes from their legal counsels there and elsewhere.  NPR reported this morning that Walmart has said that it had already admitted having knowledge of the bribes in 2005, just as ACORN International’s India FDI Watch Campaign was gaining steam and our work organizing Walmart workers and Florida alliances was underway in the US.  They continue to be silent on why they did nothing to stop the bribes or modify their corrupt corporate culture or report the violations to any authorities in the United States or Mexico.

Thanks to Professor Stiglitz, who is also credited in many circles for promoting the 99% percent argument about inequality among academics, we may have found a friend that will be harder to ignore in India and the United States, if it is not too late.


2 thoughts on “Stiglitz Opposes India FDI Modifications, Walmart Admits Knowledge of Bribes

    1217 Opal Drive
    Fox Milne,
    Milton Keynes,
    MK15 0ZR.
    United Kingdom.
    Mobile: +447042035199

    We are here to introduce a loan program that will help improve your financial situation, economic and relieve you of all financial crises.

    Loan request: You have to be able to articulate how much your business needs, how the loan funds will be used, the type of loan request you need, and how much capital you have on hand.

    Specialized in providing loans from the range of € 5,000 and above all, as car loan, we offer loan in the short and long term for customers at a rate of 3% etc.

    We give out our Loan in USD($) and GBP(£) and any currency of your choice.

    * Are you financially tuned down
    * Do you need funds to pay off credits and debts
    * Do you need finance to set up your own business
    * Are you in need of private or business loans for various purposes
    * Do you need loans to carry out large projects

    We offer the following types of loans:

    *Commercial Loans.
    *Personal Loans.
    *Business Loans.
    *Investments Loans.
    *Development Loans.
    *Acquisition Loans.

    If you really acknowledge this content, you are to send the details information to the account overleaf.

    (1) Full Name:

    (2) Loan Amount Needed:

    (3) Duration of Repayment:

    (4) Country:

    (5) Marital Status:

    (6) Gender:

    (8) Age:

    (9) Occupation:

    (10) Mobile:


    Payment by bank to bank transfer 48 hours
    Payment by bank certified check 9 days

    – The First option which is by bank to bank transfer, loan
    funds are transferred directly into your account with the aid of our

    – As for the last option, a certified check is made out by our bank as a
    draft, which can be cashed by clients anywhere in the world, it takes
    4 working days to get to the applicant and 5 days for the check to be



    Mr. Rodney Hayne
    Enjoy Online Banking and Best Services Offer!!!

  2. India has a history of corruption steeped deep in our mind. Thus even inflow of FDI needed for the
    development of the country is subjected to corruption. In this rising inflationary era if Walmart brings down prices due to its capacity of bulk buying what seems to problem? It will be a boon to the lower middle class and increase their saving capacity. This certainly will fill the coffers of the government through indirect taxes which can be used for nation building. That’s where the influx of Foreign Direct Investment will have the greatest effect. As for bribe taking both the demander and giver are equal. But then again no businessman gives bribes unless demanded. We need FDI. Period. All upright citizens should shake of this demonic plague of corruption and make India the hotspot of FDI.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.