Tag Archives: media

Tired of Trump Already

Trump Overload

New Orleans   Broadcasters, like CNN and others, report record profits this year because audiences were eating up news of Trump like it was candy. Some newspapers and magazines are reporting surges of subscribers as readers struggle to keep up with the shenanigans and machinations of Trump transition and the world to come. The volume of news and views on social media on the back and forth of Trump world are climbing. I thought media personalities, like Trump, thought seriously about things like over-exposure? I have to admit, I’m already just plain tired of Trump, and he hasn’t even moved into Pennsylvania Avenue yet.

It’s all just too, too much. And, it’s not just him, it’s the whole family. Geez!

People bidding $60,000 to charities for coffee with daughter, Ivanka. Listening to the radio on my way home the other night, I heard about some kind of a guns-and-gold fundraiser ostensibly for conservation causes that featured hunting and fishing with Donald, Jr. or Eric for days on end if you ponied up a half-million or a full million. Both events were canceled with the usual, uh-ohs, but here in the no-boundary land we’re entering, there’s simply no moral compass that seems to help this tribe avoid a mess and force the rest of us to have to endure wallowing through it with them.

Much of it is like that, just plain silly.

One day we have to read that Trump and his entourage may stay at his new Trump hotel in Washington, DC before he moves into the White House and paints all of the rooms gold. Later, his people finally say, no, he’ll stay at Blair House like all of the rest of them did when they started moving to town.

Hey, it’s Saturday Night Live!

We have to hear whether he likes the way Alec Baldwin satirizes him on “Saturday Night Live” with a tangerine wig and “puffs” in his speech and a lumbering walk. Trump tweets about this of course. He’s unhappy. He says it’s “sad.”

Really, are we supposed to care?

I’m so sick of reading about Trump that I’ve started to think it’s strategic. He’s deliberately trying to wear all of us down, well he’s worn me out. I’m becoming paranoid. I think he wants us to finally say, “Enough!,” and throw the papers down and turn off the radio and television, so he can do whatever he damned well pleases, however he pleases. He wants to bore us to the point that we just let all of this little stuff go.

He wants us to skip over the constant concerns about ethics, his children, his business high-jinks, and everything else. He wants us to enter a personal triaging of sorts, where we classify this all as small fry, and just concentrate on whether or not he gives the country away to Russia or goes to war with China, heats up the planet, deports millions, sells branding rights to the White House and Air Force One, and, you know, ends democracy and America as we know it.

This is going to be a very long four years, and I have to admit, I’m already burned out on Trump, and the clock hasn’t even started ticking off the time yet.


Crony Capitalism and the Logrolling Culture


“THE LAST ROLL”, by THOMAS NAST, published in “Harper’s Weekly” February 1886.

New Orleans    Logrolling is such a nice, archaic American expression that, excuse the pun, it just sort of rolls off of your tongue.

Wikipedia looks at the expression as a mutual back scratch:


Logrolling is the trading of favors, or quid pro quo, such as vote trading by legislative members to obtain passage of actions of interest to each legislative member.[1] In an academic context, the Nuttall Encyclopedia describes logrolling as “mutual praise by authors of each other’s work”. In organizational analysis, it refers to a practice in which different organizations promote each other’s agendas, each in the expectation that the other will reciprocate.


And, how often does one get to bring the legendary Davy Crockett into a modern conversation, yet here he is, front and center, according to some:


The first known use of the term was by Congressman Davy Crockett, who said on the floor (of the U.S. House of Representatives) in 1835, “my people don’t like me to log-roll in their business, and vote away pre-emption rights to fellows in other states that never kindle a fire on their own land.”[6]


Applied in other contexts, I wonder how different logrolling might be from crony capitalism. Quid pro quo’s are rife there as well, and although generally this is an insult hurled at developing countries and their business dealings, it also is something heard in the Tea Party critiques of Congress and modern American politics. Wikipedia offers:


Crony capitalism is a term describing an economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials. It may be exhibited by favoritism in the distribution of legal permits, government grants, special tax breaks, or other forms of state interventionism.


Hmmm. There do seem to be some similarities between the two, more a difference in degree than distinction.

All of this comes to mind reading the daily papers and opinion setting magazines. All of a sudden, the New York Times will have review of a book in the daily papers, plus the Sunday book review section, and if you are Patti Smith, Mary Louise Parker, or Gloria Steinem, by god you’ll be in the Style section as well and maybe land a profile in The New Yorker to boot and a little something-something in the Wall Street Journal and on down the line. The political philosopher Herbert Marcuse once famously referred to the media as the “flesh-eating machine,” but he may not have had his ear to the cash register for the logrolling “cha-ching!”

It’s not just a matter of reporters and papers currying favor, friends, and sales among authors, entertainers and cultural icons that seems so much like mutual backscratching that we wonder if we’re getting the real lowdown. Getting ready to recycle some magazines, I noticed a copy of Trout, published by Trout Unlimited last spring that I had forgotten to haul off to Montana this summer. Flipping through the pages from the back I found myself doing a page turn because the giant advertisements were accompanied by a 12-page spread on their buddy corporate partners in clothing, gear makers and the like, that was supposed to not be advertising. Was there any line between the two? Was this logrolling or crony capitalism disguised as thanks for financial support, and was there a difference? Are they really good and true environmentalists and conservationists or are they just passing the buck over to Trout Unlimited?

If you’re just Joe Sausagehead like most of us around the country and not walking the runway, living in Manhattan, or catching the train underneath the Capitol, how do you get the straight scoop anymore? How do you separate the stories from the sales pitch, no matter how subtle and avoid mutual handwashing and backscratching? Logrolling and crony capitalism seem to be something blind to the eye of the beholder.

I’m probably just grumpy today. I’m sure we’re all just supposed to take a deep breath and remember that this is just the “way things work.” Unless of course, you are “them,” and not “us.”