Guest Worker Abuses

NO Workers Justice CenterSaket Soni and the New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice have beaten the drum in the more than four years since Hurricane Katrina about the abuses to south Asian guest workers pulled into the shipyards during the desperate labor supplies after the storm.  Lawsuits against Signal International now coming to light reveal clearly the dark underbelly of the H-2B temporary guest worker program, and why it is so clearly not a solution to the immigration crises in our country.

            Primarily Indian metalworkers paid brokers up to $20,000 USD, which is literally a king’s ransom in rupees, to undertake the work.  They expected and put up with the terrible living conditions common in a labor camp in the shipyard, especially in the post-Katrina.  What they also expected was that promises of a green card which would allow them to continue working in the USA would also be delivered, since that was so clearly the line that recruited them to the shipyards.   Unfortunately, as any reader would know, that line was a total line.

Continue Reading Guest Worker Abuses

500,000+ Flee Mortgages in 2008

foreclosure-thumb-440x330New Orleans I have taken some heat for recommending that homeowners who are underwater walk away from their mortgage obligations in the face of totally, and now admittedly, inept response to the foreclosure crisis by the Obama Administration all facilitated by the total greenwash of the banks by Treasury Secretary Geithner.  It seems according to numbers crunched by Oliver Wyman consultants from credit bureau data reported in the New York Times that an estimated “17% of owners defaulting in 2008, or 588,000” voted with their feet to walk away from shrinking values and no relief.  And, that’s 2008!  Wait until we see the numbers for 2009 and the march to the street, and the running stampede as this problem hits its apex in 2010.

The Wyman calculations were based on credit bureau data and derived from the number that went from being “current on their mortgage to default, rather than making spotty payments.”  Accurately this is a walk away profile, abandoning any pretense of looking for remediation based on inability to pay.  These are homeowners that could and had been paying, but who looked at the bottom line, read the paper, and realized it was going to be decades before they got their money back.

Continue Reading 500,000+ Flee Mortgages in 2008

Small Scotia Steps on Remittances

scotiatowerNew Orleans Handling remittances from working immigrant families is such a lucrative business that progress is measured in very small steps.  We were delighted to take one with Scotia Bank when they announced in Toronto that they were lowering costs for remittances from their account holders using a combination of their online access and a partnership with Western Union.   ACORN Canada had made this demand as part of the back-and-forth last summer in Community Organizations International / ACORN International’s first multinational campaign focusing on remittances.  We were delighted that they made this concession to us, but….

It’s hard to be happy even with a small victory because there is so much more.  Even with the online capacity being installed for Scotia customers, the costs are still way out of line with the reality of the bank’s costs, making this a huge profit center, and therefore almost certainly predatory.

Scotia now trumpets that it will charge $9.00 plus 1% on any transaction.  On $100 bucks the minimum charge would be $10.00 or 10% of the total transaction.  Oh, no, that’s not right!

On the Scotia website they advertise the savings:

  • $10.20 from Toronto to China on a $580 remittance
  • $16.80 from Montreal to USA on a $420 remittance
  • $4.00 from Calgary to Philippines on a $100 remittance
  • $7.80 from Toronto to India on a $320 remittance
  • $7.70 from Vancouver to Jamaica on a $130 remittance

Continue Reading Small Scotia Steps on Remittances

Services Suck I Guess

HomelessShelter2New Orleans        I spend a lot of time (sweat and work, too!) thinking about how to build more sustainable organizations that are less donor driven especially to support international organizing, but indeed it’s a universal problem.  Today’s Wall Street Journal has an article, “Mergers, Closings Plague Charities” by Shelly Banjo and S. Mitra Kalita that raises similar, troubling questions along with a piece in today’s Times about the total lack of boundaries between Harper’s Magazine and its donor and publisher in the MacArthur Foundation.

In a nutshell part of the problem seems to be that donors who make their money from business want the charities to work on the same business principles and performance standards as they deliver services.  Is this really always possible?  Or, are we to conclude that there is really no such thing as “charity,” and that services that don’t pay off, whether housing or mental health or long form journalism, just suck and out to be killed.

That seems to be the position of Diane Aviv, head of the Independent Sector, as she’s quoted in the Journal:
“Like in the animal kingdom, at some point, the weaker organizations will not be able to survive,” says Diana Aviv, chief executive of Independent Sector, a coalition of 600 nonprofits.

Continue Reading Services Suck I Guess

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes