ACORN’s Thanks to Roy Reed, Star Reporter for the New York Times

New Orleans   Roy Reed passed away at 87 from a stroke. He had been many things over the years, working most recently as a journalism professor at the University of Arkansas and earlier as a reporter for the Arkansas Gazette, when it was still a stand alone newspaper. He was also a reporter for the New York Times working in Washington and then covering the South from 1965 to 1978 as a national reporter based in New Orleans. He was famous for his brilliant and lucid coverage of the civil rights movement that helped propel the movement nationally.

It’s hardly a footnote to his career, but it was a milestone in the development and national growth of ACORN as well, when Reed filed a story in 1976 on ACORN, marking the first serious examination of the organization in the national media. Reading the piece more than 40 years later, it offers a stark contrast with modern reporting in its calm effort at objectivity and, “just the facts, ma’am” attitude. It seems to deliberately seek to inform and educate readers, in this case about an upstart outfit called ACORN. It’s not the piece many would have written, but it was a piece that because of its tone and plain statement helped propel ACORN to the organization it would become.

In honor of both Reed’s work and ACORN’s, here it is…

Lobby of Have-Nots Nettles The Southern Establishment

By ROY REED Special to The New York Times
October 06, 1976,

LITTLE ROCK, Ark., Oct. 2 An unusual political force that began six years ago in Arkansas is nettling the economic and political establishments in a widening swath across this region.

It is the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, popularly known as ACORN.

The association is a collection of 120 neighborhood organizations in low-to-middle income communities in six states. It claims more than 7000 member families.

It began in Little Rock, spread through other cities and towns in Arkanas, then expanded to several major cities in the surrounding states of Missouri, Texas, Louisiana and Tennessee.

It also established branches in South Dakota at the invitation of Senator James Abourezk, a Democrat, who heard in Washington of ACORN’s growth.

Most Potent Have-Nots

The membership is about 60 percent white and 40 percent black. Most members have incomes of less than $8000 a year.

These people have long had little to say about how they were governed. That is changing so rapidly in Arkansas that some are calling ACORN the most potent organization of have-nots in the region since the Southern Tenant Farmers Union grew out of eastern Arkansas in the 1930s.

ACORN’s main adversaries have been local governments and utility companies. It fights the governnments for better services and facilities in low-income neighborhoods and it fights the utilities on everything from high rates to pollution.

It recently added banks to its list. In the November election it will be battling the wealthiest financial institutions, the largest businesses and industries and the most powerful utility in Arkansas. And it will be fighting powerful interests in Missouri to remove the state sales tax from food and drugs.

The organization still finds time for scores of local battles over flooded yards, dogs on the loose and intersections without stop signs.

ACORN was indulged at first as the visionary tinkering of post-Vietnam War youths looking for a cause. Now that it has become a threat – and the membership rolls have taken on as many old folk as youngsters – the country clubs and chambers of commerce that historically have run things in towns like Little Rock have begun to stir uneasily.

A few weeks ago, Mayor George Wimberly of Little Rock, denounced an ACORN plan for lowering electric rates as “socialism in the worst degree.” State Representative Boyce Alfard of Pine Bluff has called ACORN a threat to capitalism.

Headed by Retired Blacksmith

Warning alarms are being sounded in towns and council chambers in cities of the region as ACORN extends its reach.

The leader of the Arkansas board is a retired railroad blacksmith named Willard Johnson. His political relationship to socialism is about as close as Barry Goldwater’s. He is leaning toward voting for President Ford in this year’s election.

People like Johnson, unlike the rich real estate interests and bankers who make the big decisions here, has never had much clout at City Hall.

He and his neighbors in southwestern Little Rock complained for years, without results, about poor drainage that caused flooding in their yards and in some of their houses.

They heard about ACORN and some decided to join. With help from the organization, they got a $900,000 Federal grand to rework ditches and streets in the neighborhood. And they have a promise from the corps of engineers of a longterm drainage plan.

First Goals are Modest

ACORN’s first projects in a newly organized neighborhood generally are modest campaigns such as improving garbage collection and getting traffic lights installed. Winning is important. The young professional organizers believe that they need repeated victories to keep the members enthusiastic.

Once the members learn that they can attain power by organizing, they usually set their sights higher. Then the various groups in an area join to fight for lower utility rates or equalized tax assessments or a slate of candidates for local office.

ACORN’s founder and chief organizer is a 28-year old Williams College dropout named Wade Rathke. He has lived in various parts of the country, the longest in New Orleans. He began as an organizer for the National Welfare Rights Organization in Massachusetts.

Mr. Rathke and George Wiley, the late head of the welfare rights group, decided that a more effective organization might be built if it had a broader base than one composed of welfare clients alone. With Mr. Wiley’s encouragement and initial financial aid, Mr. Rathke chose Arkansas with its diverse population and geography to test the theory. He came here in 1970.

Mr. Rathke, who is white, was determined to avoid the race-baiting that destroyed Southern populist movements in the past. He made sure that ACORN always had a solid mixture of black and white members.

“There’s something about ACORN,” Mr. Johnson said, “it doesn’t make any difference what a person’s skin is. That’s one benefit I think I’ve gotten out of ACORN. Our people have common problems and they try to help one another, not kick them in the butt because they’re black or Catholic or something else.”

An example of ACORN’s power was the passage of a law by the Arkansas legislature permitting physicians to prescribe drugs by lower-cost generic rather than brand names.

An ACORN unit of older people at Hot Springs originated the campaign. The larger organization persuaded Gov. David H. Pryor to help push it through the legislature. Later, ACORN, helped persuade the state pharmaceutical board to permit drug advertising.

ACORN gets much of the credit for scaling down a huge new coal burning electric generating plant south of Little Rock. The Arkansas Power and Light Company was required to cut the project in half and install pollution devices after ACORN and other groups and individuals protested.

The organization is now trying to force the same power company to shed part of its collections from small households to favored industrial users that have always paid lower rates. Six Arkansas cities will vote on the ACORN proposition in November. Industrial and governmental interests have joined the power company in fight it.

Lobbying, Publicity, Lawsuits

ACORN uses lobbying, publicity, lawsuits, public hearings and any other kind of persuasion it can find.

ACORN members and some of their political allies are now working for a slate of candidates for the Little Rock City Council.

The staff of 35 – organizers, lawyers, researchers – earn lower salaries than many of the people they recruit. Beginning organizers are paid $45 a week and senior ones, $90.

As ACORN affiliate known as the Arkansas Institute for Social Justice has begun to train organizers for other groups around the country. In 1975, Mr. Rathke said, it trained 450 persons for 55 other organizations.

The organization’s member families pay dues of $16 per year. From various sources, including consulting work and small foundation grants, the group takes in and spends about $250,000 a year, Mr. Rathke said.

Mr. Rathke is anxious that the organization not grow too fast. He believes that has killed other mass organizations. The expansion to Memphis, where ACORN began working last summer, will be the last one for several months.


Please enjoy Sheryl Crow’s The Dreaming Kind.

Thanks to Kabf.


Nonprofits May Be Able to Go Politically Wild Thanks to House Republicans

New Orleans   The “law of unintended consequences” is not one that was passed by the US House of Representatives and its far right, ideological Republican majority, but it is certainly one that they might soon learn at their peril.

One of the many hidden time bombs in their recent tax bill, now heading towards conference with the Senate, was originally a repeal of the Johnson Amendment that prohibits tax-exempt charities from political activity. Initially, their amendment was only a wet kiss to the heavy breathers in their religious base who wanted a special exemption to practice politics from the pulpit. Not to be outdone – the final version of the House bill instead opens a political floodgate for charities to go wild. Their bill says that any tax-exempt charity can boost or bust political candidates if “the preparation and presentation of such content” is “in the ordinary course of the organization’s regular and customary activities” and does not result in more than de minimis incremental expenses.” (thanks to Ellen P. Aprill a tax law professor at Loyola Law School who read and reported the language!)

So, sure, that would cover preaching, because there’s no cost in adding an endorsement into a sermon, but it would also cover a world of other things that fit fully into a nebulous “de minimis” standard like a banner across a website’s home page, constant Twitter and Facebook posts, and endless email blasts all of which have virtually no cost. Remember as well that these standards are all set and monitored by the Internal Revenue Service, which to date, since the passage of the Johnson Amendment, has never clarified the existing standard of what might be permissible political activity, leaving the matter to institutional restraint and lawyer empowering, as one outfit after another takes a stab at a number, whether less than 5% or 8% or zero. Remember also that because of that the penalties are also somewhere between nil and a hand slap. President Trump’s own foundation was caught in this mess, as you may also remember, when he used the foundation’s funds to make several political contributions at the 5-figure levels, all of which he remedied by repaying the foundation. There was never a question about whether he was going to surrender the tax exemption of his foundation and certainly no evidence that the IRS was threatening to take it away. Without the thin shield of the Johnson Amendment, there will be no practical limits to what nonprofits might be able to do.

The Republican House may think more activism from the pulpit makes it all worthwhile, but they aren’t the only nonprofits who can jump into the partisan playgrounds. Take nonprofit hospitals for example, which still make up almost 60% of hospitals. A list of the top six systems from Ascension to Kaiser in the Wall Street Journal indicated they were turning over $158.5 billion dollars annually. Hospitals were pretty united in their opposition to the Republican efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, and will be even more committed to any cutbacks in Medicaid or Medicare. If “de minimis” was 5%, they could spent almost $8 billion, but even dropping notices in every bill or banners on every sign-up for your medical records online now would certainly get the message out. It would also cost just the same for doctors and nurses to whisper in patients’ ears as it cost for the pastor to slip an endorsement in a prayer.

Churches are shrinking while many other parts of the nonprofit sector, like healthcare, are soaring. The Republican House might should get on their knees and offer something up to the Republican Senate to save them from this repeal before the law of unintended consequences makes them give more than they hope to receive.