Tag Archives: equity

Dismantling the False Paths to Equity

New Orleans      I’ll never forget the surprise on a colleague’s face who was working to build a nonprofit community development organization in the Mississippi delta several years ago when we first met.  A lot of her work had been focused on schools and enhancing their curriculum for young people.  When I questioned her and stated flatly that education was fine and good, but was not a path to equity, she had a stricken look on her face, as if I had tossed a cup of cold water in it.  We went back and forth for several minutes. I referenced studies and research, and she spoke from a lifetime of deeply-held personal ideology and belief and a family tradition that had been dictated from her mother and followed by her large family to some success around the country.  It was not an argument that I sought or thought I could win, even as I was trying to nudge her towards organizing for power, so I left it quickly and retreated to safer ground for further discussions.

The Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, Nikole Hannah-Jones, eviscerates such claims without much worrying about any middle ground in a recent article in the New York Times citing the fact that, “college simply does not pay off for black Americans the way it does for other groups.” They are as likely to be “unemployed as white Americans with a high school education.”  Black graduates still hold “less wealth than white Americans who have not even completed high school.”  As many studies have noted, and she underlines, they are forced to borrow more for college and have more debt when they graduate.  Even conservatives, like the Times own columnist, David Brooks, have finally conceded that education is not the path to racial equity.

Of course, that is not to say that other paths to racial equity are all that much better.  Hannah-Jones enlists an array of facts,

  • Poor white families making less than $27,000 annually have as much wealth as black families making between $48,000 and $76,000.
  • Black families save at a higher rate than white families and offer more financial support for their children’s higher education than whites.
  • Homeownership isn’t the answer, as ACORN has painfully come to realize, since black Americans have higher mortgage rates with equal credit and their homes do not appreciate value in their neighborhoods.
  • Family structure isn’t the answer, because white single women with children have the same amount of wealth as black women with no children, while the average white single parent has twice the wealth of the typical two-parent black family.

If as a society and a country we want to achieve more equity, especially racial equity, it is impossible not to follow paths that involve significant reparations.  There’s just no way around it.


Aaron is Right, Aviv is Wrong: The Wealthy Cannot Keep Escaping Taxes

Aaron Dorfman

Quito   A number of the big dog, nonprofit charities trooped over to visit with Congress to try to protect every dime of their tax breaks, especially the blanket deductions that favor the rich and superrich.   They were led by Diane Aviv, the longtime head of Independent Sector, the big nonprofits trade group that has recently been squealing like a stuck pig about any change in their favored loophole status.   Having run nonprofits for decades, I have to say it’s an embarrassing spectacle.  There is no way that Aviv and the mega-charities speak for progressive nonprofits.

Luckily, Aaron Dorfman, head of the National Center for Responsive Philanthropy, does, or at least tries to, according to the statement his organization released that was quoted in the New York Times:

 “If nonprofit leaders don’t want changes to the charitable deduction, it is imperative that we get behind the president’s call for higher tax rates on the wealthy,” said Aaron Dorfman of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy in a statement. “The majority of nonprofits know this is true,” Mr. Dorfman said, “and I urge the hundreds of nonprofit leaders who have traveled to our nation’s capital for visits with members of Congress today to clearly advocate for higher tax rates on the wealthy in addition to their advocacy in opposition to any changes to the charitable deduction.”

Ok, well he doesn’t quite speak for all of us, since the deduction does need some changes, as I argued a couple of days ago in these pages.   Nonetheless, Aaron, whom I have known back to his days as an ACORN organizer in Minnesota and Florida knows better and still has to work with these people and get invited to their club meetings from time to time, so this was clearly the best he could do by at least siding with the White House on the need for reform and more taxes on the wealthy, which was miles farther than the rest of these folks and the Independent Sector seem willing to do.

Their position is becoming a shameful case of self-dealing in the face of the clear and obvious need for equity and justice in the country.  How can so many of these big timers like Catholic Charities stand for that?  United Way, who is surprised, since they have been a business plaything for years in countless communities, but jeez!

And, for what?  Even Mitt Romney’s position was better than theirs!

There’s also pretty clear reasons to believe that Aviv and the Independent Sector are fudging on the potential impact of even the White House’s modest proposal to lower the cap on the deduction from 35% to 28% for families with incomes over $350,000 per year.   Also from the Times:

Capping the value of the deduction, as the White House has suggested, might reduce giving by as much as $7 billion a year out of $300 billion over all, according to an estimate by Independent Sector.  But other estimates have proved more moderate. For instance, the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University last year analyzed the Obama administration’s proposal to increase marginal tax rates and cap the value of charitable giving. It estimated that itemized giving would have declined just 0.4 percent in the first year after being put in place and 1.3 percent in the second. “This suggests a relatively small direct impact, but combined with the weak economic climate, funding reductions and increased demand for services already affecting some nonprofits and their constituents, these changes are likely to have an additional negative effect in the long term,” Patrick M. Rooney, executive director of the Center on Philanthropy, said in a statement.

So, not only is Aaron right and Aviv wrong.  Aviv may be gilding the lily for her big time  backers and padding the facts, when we need a clear and united voice for nonprofits that it is time for more equity and justice for all Americans not just protection of special benefits and deals for Aviv and her buddies.

As Aaron says, “…it is imperative that we get behind the president’s call for higher tax rates on the wealthy.  The majority of nonprofits know this is true…”

Aaron speaks for us.  Please listen to him, not Aviv, and give us tax reform, including reform on charitable deductions!