Tag Archives: property owners

Bullying Low-and-Moderate Income Homeowners with Paperwork and Fines

New Orleans      I thought of an article I had torn out of the New York Times and stuck into my bag to read more closely on my quick trip to Katmandu recently, when I got a weird email on the same trip.  The Historic Districts Landmarks Commission (HDLC) in New Orleans had sent us a bizarre missive, labeled as a Demolition notice, or more accurately, a threat to demolish, for the ACORN Global Enterprise property on Ponce de Leon where we operated the Fair Grinds Coffeehouse social enterprise.  Admittedly, they caught my attention, and, sure enough, many of our properties have now found themselves in Historic Districts where we can potentially be subjected to such bullying.

We knew of no complaints.  There had been no HDLC inspection.  What was the issue?  Finally, reading the thing, it was just a bullying threat because they had somehow observed that several weatherboards needed to be fixed.  This is New Orleans and a tropical climate and a large two-story frame house.  There are always going to be weatherboards that need to be tightened and fixed.  It is a commonplace matter of no great consequence that will cost a couple of hundred to repair at most, so what was the beef?  The HDLC notice seemed to want us to come in and get a permit to do the work.  I wasn’t born yesterday.  You only need a permit from HDLC if you are altering a property in some material way in an historic district.  No permit is needed for routine repairs that maintain existing conditions.  This whole thing on paper seems to add up to little more than municipally sanctioned harassment and a revenue scam for a small agency.  The actions of HDLC are the real nuisance here.  Does one waste the time messing with them or just fix the couple of weatherboards and let it ride?

The story in the Times demonstrated how harrowing – and expensive – such bullying and nuisances can become.  The article focused on the spiraling Catch-22 homeowners in Queens and elsewhere in New York City can face over simple problems like this in their homes.  The NYC Building Department might issue a citation for something, but confused homeowners often uncertain how to respond, delaying, or not understanding the procedure find themselves facing a series of fines for lateness that multiply and snowball.  As the Times reports:

 “Before filing a certification, homeowners must have the condition fixed, which often begins with paying for a permit.  But before they can get the permit, they must pay additional civil penalties, incurred alongside the fines for construction issues.  Until the civil penalties are paid, owners will receive one fine after another for failing to comply.”

Understand this clearly, this is often after the problem was fixed and repaired, eliminating any safety concern or in the case of the niggling HDLC in New Orleans, aesthetic issue was addressed.

The Times pictured one house where three violations had incurred $495,800 in fines!  What in the world is the purpose of that?  Under what rationale of public policy can this level of bullying and predation by public bodies be excused?

I can think of none, and I believe there is none.


Please enjoy Dark Night Of The Soul by Van Morrison.

Thanks to KABF.


Hiding Real Estate Ownership from Tenants and Land Contract Holders

New Orleans   Recently I listened to the presentation of a fine group of graduate students at the School of Social Work at Georgia State University that summarized the results of four months of work in collaboration with the ACORN Home Savers Campaign.  The report indicated the results were mixed.  Our contact and outreach goals were unrealistic.  There were a lot of reasons for that, but one the report didn’t detail, but one that all of them had experienced, was the difficulty of putting the list together of families who were on installment land contracts of various kinds.

They might have gotten cricks in their necks as they nodded in agreement with writers of the Times’ “Upshot” column on “the opaque world of ownership by L.L.Cs.”  The hook on the column was the umbrage that has been expressed by Fox provocateur and wielding right winger, Sean Hannity, about the revelations of his extensive use of LLCs or limited liability corporations first in The Guardian and now more generally.  Property ownership and tax records are supposed to be public, so you might wonder what’s the beef?  The use of LLCs was designed to provide exactly what the name says, limited liability, for property holders from external threats.  We were amused when the conservative Congressional yahoos were attacking ACORN for the number of corporate entities that were part of the ACORN family of organizations, since so many of them were separate building entities or property-based LLCs that are standard in all business, nonprofit or profit based.  Hannity seems to believe everything about property ownership should be private and obscure, and real estate markets in New York City and London are well known playgrounds for hidden transfers of the rich and corrupt from around the globe.

At the same time Upshot joined the wailing wall of the GSU students and many of the volunteer army of researchers that have worked to create the doorknocking lists for ACORN Home Savers Campaign by unraveling property records, especially given the propensity of all of these kinds of companies to not register their holdings.  Upshot seemed to be looking over our shoulder in places like Memphis where we found it next to impossible to correctly identify all of the ownership vehicles and properties owned by hedge funds like Apollo and others in the market.

They note that a Harvard doctoral student, Adam Travis, has found that in markets like Milwaukee a quarter of the rental market is held by LLCs.   The downsides are numerous when anyone gets around to looking.  The Hannity’s, superrich, launderers, and mobsters might get upset, but the real victims are lower income tenants-buyers who have no idea who really owns their house behind some address in South Carolina or Texas where they are sending their payments.  Cities that want to hold owners accountable for abandoned or delinquent properties are also stuck with the same problem in finding the real owners behind the shells, some of which have gone under as well.  In Cleveland recently, I listened to a discussion of the problem of foreclosed houses cycling in and out of city control in lower income neighborhoods in sort of a reverse dump by hidden LLC owners when they couldn’t sell or rehab so simply abandoned properties back to the city housing list.

As Times’ reporter Emily Badger summarizes, “it is no easy thing to get a faceless company to court.”  As we have found, it is even harder for a tenant or an owner-occupant to hold such a deed holder or landlord accountable.  A city’s exasperation should be matched by a commitment to fix the problem, not a rationale for how hard it is to help its citizens get a small modicum of justice in the housing market.