Tag Archives: Sherry Linkon

Time to Make a Deal on the Federal Minimum Wage

New Orleans   The following is my guest blog on the Working Class Perspectives site run by Professor Sherry Linkon of Georgetown and Professor John Russo, formerly of Youngstown State University in Ohio and now visiting scholar with the Kalmanovitz Initiative for Labor and Working Poor, also at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.

The federal minimum wage has been stuck at $7.25 per hour since 2009.  Until last year, when the unemployment rate dropped almost to the level of full employment, wages were stagnant, exacerbating inequality.  In 2018, average hourly earnings went up 3.15% and closed the year with a 3.9% jump.  Even with those recent adjustments, workers still need a federal minimum increase.

The Raise the Wage Act offers the prospect for change.  The bill was introduced in May 2017 by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), the ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, but it died in committee in 2018 with 170 co-sponsors, Democrats all.  It proposed a dollar-a-year increase over seven years, eventually reaching $15.00 – more than twice the current minimum.  It would also phase out lower pay for tip-credit workers who are currently frozen at $2.13 per hour as well as disabled worker exceptions.

The Fight for $15 campaign, largely engineered and financed by the Service Employees International Union, has been a key force in defining $15.00 an hour as the goal.  Their work has helped set eight states on the path to establishing minimum wages of between $12 and $15 per hour in coming years, including Arizona, California, Colorado, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, and Washington.  Thirteen cities, including New York City, Seattle, and San Jose, are already at $15 or higher.  While Fight for $15 has created momentum for the new Democratic House majority, today’s leaders should not forget the lessons learned from decades of living wage fights.

On January 18, 1997, ACORN and Local 100, United Labor Unions (then affiliated with the SEIU), presented voters in Houston, Texas with what seemed a radical proposal at the time: a city ordinance to raise the minimum wage to the level of $6.50 per hour for all workers.  Only months before, the federal minimum had finally risen from $4.25 per hour to $4.75.  In a patronizing campaign against us, service industry and general business employers insisted that they understood our demand, but we were going about it the wrong way, and our proposal would cost jobs.  While we won in lower-income and working-class districts, we lost the election 2 votes to 1. In River Oaks, the district where former President George H. Bush lived and voted, we garnered just one vote.

Soon after, ACORN put a similar proposal before Denver voters, asking them to approve a minimum wage of $6.25.  An expensive, blunt force campaign in the final two weeks by the hotel and restaurant association and fast food operators swamped us. Again, we lost two to one loss even as we swept black and brown, lower income, and working precincts throughout the city.

We learned a key lesson from those losses: do the research. In Arizona, Michigan, Florida, and Ohio, we used polling to find out the rate that would gain support from at least 60% of voters. When we did that, even strident corporate campaigns didn’t block our way. Where we couldn’t do polling, we pegged the increase more modestly as a premium above the federal minimum, usually one dollar, which won in New Orleans, Missouri, and elsewhere. Once we learned to propose acceptable target rates, we won many more votes, and no living wage statewide proposition has lost at the ballot box in more than a dozen years. Between 1996 and 2008, we won more than 125 “living wage” campaigns around the country, delivering billions of dollars’ worth of raises to millions of workers. Where we won increases indexed to cost-of-living, like Florida, lower-waged workers continue to benefit.

State and local minimum wage and living wage campaigns have continued in full force and fury.  Approximately twenty states and twenty-three localities now have higher base hourly wage rates than the federal standard, and some 5.2 million workers began this year with a wage increase. Individual bumps in annual pay from $90 to $1300 add up to about $5.4 billion of increased income for workers. This is good news. But workers in twenty-nine states – about 2.2 million people — are still stuck at $7.25 per hour – or less!

It’s time to make a deal.

Reportedly, Democrats believe they now have enough votes to pass something like the Raise Wages Act and demand that the Senate either support, negotiate, or reject raising workers’ wages.  We need to force politicians to finally deliver, whatever the intra-party polarization and squabbles.

We also need to remember the lessons from the past.  In Houston, Denver, and initially New Orleans, we lost support when we proposed raising the minimum 37% over the existing federal standard.  To get to $15 on a fast track would be a jump of more than 100%, doubling the minimum wage.  Pew Research found only 52% support for that big an increase.

It’s just not likely to happen all at once.

Even raising the minimum $1 per year is steep and unprecedented. The last ten-year freeze of the federal minimum, between 1997 and 2007, the raise was seventy cents annually for three years l.  A dollar per year for seven years will be hard to win.

But low wage workers need a deal, and at this point, just about any raise would do. Fifty more cents an hour for a full-time, 2080 hours a year worker is over $1000.  Sure, a dollar would be even better, but any raise would be a godsend. This would be even better if we could finally win some form of automatic indexing for future increases and at least lift the cap on tipped workers’ wages.  Both of those adjustments would be worth paying some real money to achieve at the negotiating table.




Youngstown    I was in town to deliver a lecture in the Working Class Studies Series at Youngstown State University, but a lot of what interested me was to really get a sense of Youngstown after not having been here for several decades.  Youngstown has become iconic as a picture of the impact of deindustrialization.

What was a hulking steel mecca with fuming plants spewing smoke clouds through the Mahoning Valley and the jobs and union wages that people traded in exchange is smaller and cleaner, and according to Dr. John Russo, one of my hosts and along with Sherry Linkon, a co-director of the Center, but also perhaps the poorest community in the USA now.  Bruce Springsteen had memorialized Youngstown in a famous song, and Sherry and John showed me what they called the “Springsteen Grotto” in John’s office.  He had played in 1996 and on a Sunday morning had called John at home and asked if he would mind giving him a tour.  Pictures showed both men covered with snow looking at the abandoned mills.

Dr. John Russo, Co-Director of Working Class Studies Center introducing my lecture

Talking to an urban planner with the Center after my lecture, he told me about Youngstown 2010, which seemed to be held in higher regard than the usual boosterism and Babbitry associated with such enterprises.  One of the major goals, predictably in this mass media age, in fact had been to reshape the national view of Youngstown:  to de-Springsteen it perhaps.  He checked that off as having been done, but of course he means the image more likely of corruption and defeat than as a reflection of the past into the future.  That can’t be done.  The scars are everywhere.  John Russo drove me down the big houses along Fifth Avenue in Youngstown and pointed out that there was no 4th or 3rd Avenue, just this one street as a reminder of the big whoops from the mill days.  John and Sherry are also clear in their book done a decade ago and appropriately called, Steeltown USA, that there is a key role for “…memory in forming the collective identity of a place, yet we do not advocate imagining an idealized version of the past.  The idea of community can provide a powerful unifying force for shared struggle and community development.”  One thing still undone on the 2010 list for Youngstown had been dealing with “quality of life” issues, so that struggle for community development seems high on the task list.

I point to the Loews Hotel we won which used to be the Lykes building. Lykes bought and closed a mill in Youngstown and is still held in contempt.

In the questions several community leaders asked me last night about some points raised in my book, Citizen Wealth:  Winning the Campaign for Working Families, they didn’t quite get how there could be more than $2 billion in entitled benefits left on the table that Ohio residents had not been able to access despite their eligibility.  One woman asked me again to explain why people were not getting the benefits.  The question was refreshing in some ways, because it spoke to their gameness to confront the challenge in Youngstown, but it was depressing in others because it indicates that citizens can be standing in the middle of a resistance governmental bureaucracy, and unable to see the pea shuffled quickly between the shells.

Having addressed a mixed crowd of labor leaders, church officials, students, community organizers, and others, I hoped I had succeeded in making the case for thinking big and working strong.  Given its history and the commitment of so many now to its future, this small, broken city of Youngstown seems the perfect place for taking a chance and betting the whole pile.