ACORN-Related Groups Targeted by IRS over 10-Year Period

New Orleans  Hey, every day is important. We’re busy bees, and today we even have a mini-hurricane heading our way within hours, so there’s a long list.

Nonetheless, I don’t like to be one of those “I told you so folks,” especially when what I told you, repeatedly, was about some bad and evil activity by the US Internal Revenue Service, but, I have to do what I have to do, so I guess I have to remind y’all that, I told you so.

The Obama era controversy with the IRS was inspired by conservative whining that they were being discriminated against when Tea Party groups, trying to change spots, and in some cases were being rejected in their applications for tax exempt status which requires organizations to be nonpartisan. Heads rolled, conspiracies were claimed, and so on and so on. I pointed out repeatedly during those times what was often buried in most of the reports that indicated that most of the Tea Party groups actually succeeded in being awarded tax exempt status by the IRS, but that the IRS was scrutinizing progressive groups, including former ACORN state organizations in the process of reorganization, even more severely.

In an exhaustive report the Inspector General of the Treasury Department has now conclusively revealed that in the same way the tax exempt division searched for key words on the right to give extra attention, they did the same on the left, by pulling out applications including the words “progressive,” “green,” and of course, “ACORN” or anything like it.

I knew firsthand this was the problem from frequent conversations with Craig Robbins of Action United, formerly Pennsylvania ACORN. In 2010 they had applied for a tax exemption from the IRS on the recommendation of lawyers. ACORN had been a plain vanilla nonprofit under the state laws of Arkansas and never a 501c3 tax exempt organization as classified by the IRS, but in the wake of attack from conservatives and others, lawyers had gained the upper hand in many debates over basic organizing fundamentals, so in an excess of caution to try to survive, many, if not most, of the former ACORN affiliates were applying for tax exemption in order to satisfy potential funders. Some like the organization in Pennsylvania were caught in this wave of IRS prejudice, and unlike the Tea Party whiners, it was not a matter of delays and eventually success, but outright rejection as Craig’s organization experienced.

This is the IRS friends. No apologies will be forthcoming and none are expected.

And, this is America in 2017, so even though more progressive groups were targeted, the conservatives in Congress who have been eating lunch for a long time on their various anti-tax, IRS conspiracies are also still beating the drum even in the wake of this decisive, concluding report on the IRS mischief in the tax exempt division.

I could have also told you to expect that.


Church Exemption: Good for the Goose is Good for the Gander

New Orleans   The membership of legacy religious institutions may be falling like a rock, but their privileges are increasing. President Trump last week signed an executive order that sought to do a couple of things for churches. On one hand he wanted to give them some more flexibility in opposing abortion for their workers and institutions, but most of that had already been done by the courts in the Hobby Lobby case. The other penance he offered was protection for political endorsements being made by pastors right from the pulpit, and that’s interesting.

The Internal Revenue Service provides a tax exemption under its 501c3 classification for religious institutions and other nonprofits providing charitable, educational, and other benefits. In exchange for such a tax exemption there are some restrictions including the level of profit-making enterprises escaping taxation, unless they are directly related to the mission and purpose of the exempt nonprofit. There is also a ban on political activity and endorsements.

Trump’s executive order was a promise to the evangelical and religious community that he would get them around the Johnson Amendment and its restriction on religious endorsements. In some ways this was a bit of a straw man. Priests and pastors have been making political endorsements from the pulpit for years without provoking any investigations from the IRS, so they have been able to do so with impunity. Evangelical preachers have hardly been quaking in their brogans as they have embraced and endorsed conservative politicians from right to far-righter for fear of losing their tax privileges. Archbishops and Cardinals in heavily Catholic cities and states have sometimes jumped into the middle of political campaigns, including threatening excommunication of parishioners for voting for governors, senators, and representatives bold enough to support abortions. Trump’s claim was that his order would now protect them and give them license to jump into politics at their will and whim.

Talking to the director and organizer of an environmental group the other day who was debating whether his tax exempt group needed to form an entity that could be more aggressively active in pushing climate change into the political agenda, I had jokingly suggested that since a lot of environmentalists already talked about nature as their church, a simple fix for this problem would be to just say his outfit was now religious, and say whatever they wanted to say. Now in truth Trump’s order doesn’t mean much. The IRS will likely just ignore it and given the way they’ve ignored such blatant politics in the pulpit in the past and their depleted ranks in the exemption debate, it doesn’t add up to much.

But, what’s good for the goose, should be good for the gander. If the IRS lightened up on one group of nonprofits, they would have to lighten up on the whole bunch, equal protection being what it is once the matter finds its way to the courts. Nonprofit staff and leadership wouldn’t have to dance around whether they were speaking and acting personally and not as representatives of their organizations as they jumped into politics any more than pastors and priests. The President may not care that if he opens the door for one, everybody can walk in, but if this order has any weight, that’s what it should end up meaning. What’s good for one is good for all.