Nikole Hannah-Jones Fan Club:  Join Now!

New Orleans        I don’t have time to start the Nikole Hannah-Jones Fan Club, but I’m absolutely ready to join – and pay dues.  Somebody start this, and send me a membership card, because this is one truth-telling, tell-it-like-is reporter if there ever was one, and, miracles never cease, she does so in The New York Times of all places, if you can believe that.

So, I first found myself saying “right on!” when I read her piece about the importance of busing after the Kamala Harris / Joe Biden dustup on this issue at the debate.  Her arguments there devastated anyone who might have even whispered that busing was anything but a public good and essential to racial justice.  When Biden – and Harris’ – people read that piece several months ago, they should have just waved the white flag of surrender and stepped away from the car on that issue!

What really has pulled me across the line forever though is her lead piece for the 1619 Project noting 400 years of enslavement on North American soil.  Wow!  Let me just share some examples of her arguments to give you a sense.

  • She refers to “forced labor camps” which some people call plantations.
  • She calls out ten or so of our first dozen presidents as “slavers.”
  • She nails Thomas Jefferson and the Declaration writers for their efforts to scratch out any mention of slavery in the Declaration and Constitution, but counts the times that they danced around it.
  • She cites continuing the practice of slavery as a major trigger for the demand for independence from Britain for fear that abolitionists there would force an end to the practice in the colonies.
  • She unabashedly argues that African-Americans have saved democracy in the United States from the white elites and that the best and truest Americans are in fact African-Americans.

And, let me remark again, that she does this in the Times!

In general, this is a special Times magazine section that everyone should read.

You know it by its enemies.  Former House Speaker and current Fox commentator Newt Gingrich is whining that the 1619 Project distorts history.  Of course, he is!  He represented a district in the Atlanta suburbs that one article particularly zings for creating the traffic congestion that is the legacy of slavery and persistent racism in Atlanta, and where one county continues to reject the expansion of MARTA to provide mass transit there.

Living in Louisiana, the section on sugar cane, including the fact that the French Jesuit priests planted the first cane stalks in 1751 near Baronne Street in New Orleans where one of ACORN’s old offices was located in 1978 for several years at 628, was especially painful to read.  No one living in the South escapes this reality today and the impact of its legacy.

I also have to admit that as I read Hannah-Jones’ piece when she wrote about her father’s roots having been in Greenwood, Mississippi before they ended up in Waterloo, Iowa, and that there were more lynchings in that county than any other in Mississippi where there were more than in any other state, I had to quickly doublecheck that Greenwood was in Leflore County, rather than my mother’s family next door in Sunflower County, next door, even though terribly bad in every other way imaginable.

She’s going to win a Pulitzer this year for these pieces.  The New York Times is going to win one for the 1619 Project.  I’d take a bet on both of those, as a member of her fan club, but I would also cover a bet that she at least could care less – it’s change that every word in her essay is demanding.


Please enjoy Do You Remember from Chance The Rapper ft. Death Cab For Cutie.

Thanks to KABF.


Business Executives Whitewash Their Corporate Mission

New Orleans       Well, the corporate bigshots cleared their throats, and the headline writers acted like it was news.  In business terms this would be the equivalent of trying to get something for nothing.

The Business Roundtable, a largely irrelevant propaganda and lobbying outfit for big companies, put out a press release indicating a change in its policy statement, signed by 181 of the 188 CEOs, including Apple, Walmart, and big bankers like JPMorgan Chase and Bank America, but not Blackstone or General Electric.  Instead of sticking with the old Milton Friedman rule that a company’s only mission was profit, which they shined up by claiming it was for shareholders, they altered the language.  Now it will refer to “each of our stakeholders” and commits to “deliver value to all of them, for the future success of our companies, our communities and our country.”

What does that really mean?

Well, the headliners want to claim that means more care and concern for customers, workers, the environment, and the like.  Really?  That’s reading a lot into a little.

The “future success of our companies” can cover a lot of sins and rationalizations.

In these days of where big companies seem to have moving vans parked in back with the engine running on idle so that they can move to the cheapest location or the best tax and incentive package or the lowest paid worker, no one who is awake and walking believes that big companies give a spit about “our communities.”

Globalization and neoliberalism may not be good press right this minute, but that’s not to say that any of these big companies raking in profits from around the world believe they owe much of damn for “our country.”  Like keeping jobs here.  Like paying taxes.  Or much of anything else.  There was a fascinating story recently on the big tech companies in the Times calling them out for suddenly moving from their libertarianism to become patriots because they are afraid of antitrust investigations.

Was their any mention of equity?  Was there a word about soaring CEO salaries while workers are counting raises in the pennies and minimum wage has been stuck for over a decade?

Some skeptics and members of the “old school” argued that even this new piece of pablum being fed to the public was just a dodge by the big boys trying to escape accountability and grab more power for themselves by way of discretion to do any darned thing they want.  Hard to believe that argument, since most of them are already doing that.

It’s actions that count, not words, so all of us out there working, living in our communities and country, wrestling with the environment and living our lives, shouldn’t expect anything to change based on this self-serving statement hiding under the cover of public concern.


Please enjoy Sing Along by Sturgill Simpson.

Thanks to KABF.