Tag Archives: Netherlands

Fight for $15 is Fight for 14 Euros in Europe

Amsterdam      In the second meeting of what we are now calling the “The Organizing Forum” or TOF, which I choose to pronounce as TOUGH, more than forty organizers from the Netherlands, France, Brussels, the United Kingdom, and the United States came together in Amsterdam to share experiences on organizing campaigns, strategy and tactics.  Participants included ACORN community organizers along with representatives from unions in several countries, some parliamentarians, and members and organizers from progressive political parties.  Having launched the first meeting in the fall of 2019 with less than twenty participants, TOF seemed to be moving with a full head of steam to meet a need that organizers across Europe were recognizing.

After a period of introductions and sharing, Nick Ballard, head organizer of the ACORN Union in England, gave a summary and analysis of both the recent election in the UK where the Labour Party was heavily routed in former strongholds, and what it had meant for organizing now looking forward.  The surge in growth for ACORN continuing now in the post-election period where organizing committees are queuing up in communities across the country to form new chapters is an encouraging phenomenon.

There was spirited discussion that was triggered by a session I ran for the assembly on the experience of ACORN and our unions, both with the Service Employees, United Labor Unions, the AFL-CIO, AFT, NEA, UFCW and others in building community-labor coalitions to mount organizing and issue campaigns.  We talked about the TEAM effort in the 1980s, the HOTROC campaign in the 90s, and Walmart campaign in the 2000s as good examples of the organizing efforts, as well as the partnership between ACORN and SEIU, the AFT, and the CWA in organizing home health care and home day care workers.  On issue campaigns, we discussed the living wage campaigns that ACORN had initiated with labor in the US and Canada from the 1990s until today.

All of which set the table for a discussion on the progress and potential for the Fight for 14 Euros Campaign in the Netherlands to try to raise the minimum wage per hour from 9.40 euros to 14.  The worker constituency, not surprisingly, is composed heavily of short term or no contract workers, immigrants and refugees, and subcontractors at major companies and public facilities like the giant Schiphol airport in Amsterdam.   Unions were under no illusions that this would be a quick and easy victory, and saw the fight across many fronts that included the election cycle culminating in spring 2021 as well as their efforts with their own collective agreements.  Exciting stuff with deep commitments and resources!

It was a jam-packed afternoon, and despite the fact that I was reeling from an overnight flight, I couldn’t miss the enthusiasm and the interest in continuing the momentum of putting organizers together over the coming year.


Different Crowd, Different Questions about Organizing

Dusseldorf       On a quick turnaround, “The Organizer” documentary had been translated into Dutch for the showing in Amsterdam.  Meeting at a cultural center that was walkable from near the city center with meeting spaces, a hip bar, and an art cinema, there were more than forty organizers and activists that assembled remarkably close to on time for a showing of the film.  Having now seen the film perhaps sixty times, I sit near the back and bring something to read usually if I have the opportunity to sneak out.  I actually watched this one more closely not because of the content, but in order to follow the Dutch words that seemed aligned with English and the construction of the sentences to see how difficult the language might be for an English speaker, not that I really know anything about that.  Regardless, I found it fascinating.

This was a crowd dominated by activists within the Socialist Party of the Netherlands, the organizer of the showing and the translation, so in many ways an interesting audience for the film.  Ron Meyer, the party’s chairman, moderated the question-and-answer period, and asked the first leading questions, based on a deep familiarity with the film and even more so rooted in his deep knowledge my book, Nuts and Bolts:  The ACORN Fundamentals of Organizing, where he has become perhaps my most ardent reader anywhere in the world.  I had autographed his book days earlier in Amersfoort when visiting with the organizers at their headquarters and couldn’t help noticing that his copy was already dogeared with careful underlining on page after page.  Although this is hardly the heart of the book, the fact that he has repeatedly praised the chapter called “Dues and Don’ts” is something I can hardly wait to report when I return home since there were some, including the love of my life, who argued strenuously that I should omit that chapter as too much in the weeds, so I will use his close reading as proof that I knew “my audience.”  After all, a book called Nuts and Bolts is all about getting into the weeds!

But, I digress, because we are talking about the questions from the crowd watching “The Organizer,” not reading Nuts and Bolts.  Where often people comment on the excitement or the issues or the reach of the organization, there was some of that, but not surprisingly there was a deep interest in how politics and ideology were handled.  There is a line in the movie from a 1974 training video, where I say that in ACORN, we are not Democrats or Republicans, socialists or liberals, but something different defined by our own organizational experience and action.  Believe me, they wanted to dig deeper on that point.  They wanted to know where the Democratic Socialists of America stood in the array of parties.  They wanted to know whether leaders and members talked directly about capitalism.  In a very Dutch question, as explained to me later, one woman wanted to know whether there was anyway I could image an organizing model that sought “harmonic convergence” between our members and our targets, to which I answered, no, it was unimaginable to me.

The audience couldn’t have been kinder and more receptive, but when it came to the question of whether organizational experience and action shaped ideology or whether ideology shaped organizational experience and action, there were no easy questions or answers.