Gig Economy Promoters Drinking Their Own Kool-Aid

Los Angeles     There has been a lot of talk in recent years about the explosion of the so-called “gig” economy and whether its growth foretells the future of work for Americans.  Such a future would mean a series of part-time jobs, no clear employer or employment status, skimpy to non-existent benefits and a narrow path to sustainable work for millions.  Some think that the growth of such jobs would be plentiful enough to substitute for automation and deindustrialization.  Other have argued that a universal basic income needs to supplement the availability of such work in order to create sustainability.

No one ever really knows the future, but it’s always worth some amount of worry, especially when it comes to work.  When it comes to the gig economy though a recent report by Lawrence Mishel of the respected, DC-based Economic Policy Institute lays out a comprehensive case that those soothsayers arguing that the gig economy is the future are basically drinking their own Kool-Aid at least when it comes to its current impact on employment.

The EPI report looks most carefully at recent data on Uber drivers and their incomes.  The bottom line is that Mishel found that once all expenses, commissions, and benefit costs were factored in, an Uber driver was lucky to average $9.21 per hour.  When converting the number of part-time and some time almost 850,000 Uber drivers, Mishel was only able to convert about 90,000 into full-time equivalents.  Factoring in other studies that put the impact of Uber on total gig economy at about two-thirds, the role of gig work in overall US employment was a relatively miniscule 0.1%.  That’s not nothing, but it certainly doesn’t convincingly lay claim to portending the future of work past pure speculation.

Mishel brings his argument to a sharp point on the academic side, saying,

These findings—and the fact that many Uber and other workers who provide personal services via a digital platform do so on a part-time basis primarily as a way to earn supplementary income—argue for a change in perspective. There has been much hype around Uber and the gig economy. But in our assessment, in any conference on the future of work, Uber and the gig economy deserve at most a workshop, not a plenary.

If at best it’s only worth a workshop for economists, it’s hardly worth a full beer’s worth of discussion for labor organizers.

Informal, contingent, and temporary employment, no matter what they are called in the less than full-time service economy continues to give huge definition to global and domestic employment.  These are challenges worth the full-time struggle and effort.  Gig employers seeking special favors from legislators and money from investors to allow them free rein over workers have clear interests in promoting themselves as the future of work and everything else, but the rest of us need to brush off their special pleadings and keep our eyes on creating winning strategies for workers struggling now to build power in an array of real jobs in the current economy.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Public Unions are Adjusting Their Strategies around Strikes and Checkoff

New Orleans    Public employee unions are trying to recalibrate to find a future, and there’s hope, no matter the naysayers.

Case in point of course has to be the success of the West Virginia teachers and their strike that continues to galvanize the labor movement and give courage and conviction to other unions elsewhere.  Their strike, as is well known now, not only won a 5% immediate raise in the face of a measly offer of 1% per year for several years from the negotiators and the tight-fisted state legislature, but also led to their successful demand to get the same raise for state employees in West Virginia.

Other teacher unions in states that have traditionally be very, very hard on their public employees have done their homework and studied the lessons overtime.  A teacher in Oklahoma started a Facebook page calling for a strike and picked up more than 70,000 members, quickly forcing the Oklahoma state legislature to pass the first tax hike in 28 years to offer an across the board increase of $6000.  Teacher unions are saying, that’s good, but not good enough.  30,000 are expected to rally in Oklahoma City to demand a $10,000 raise over two years to catchup.  Some Kentucky teachers waged a sickout as their demands increased.  North Carolina teachers are reportedly also debating a strike.  The message that far right, conservative, starve-the-government legislators may be starting to get is that they have gone too far and that not only are teachers and other public employees unwilling to take it, but increasingly they are confident that both their own members and the public supports their job actions.

Republicans are still hoping that the pending decision before the Supreme Court in Janus vs. AFSCME will cripple public employee unions in some of the large states that have allowed agency fee payments from nonmembers.  There are signs that unions are making headway in converting agency fee payers to members and in other states where payroll deductions for any and all public employees are threatened, they are increasingly converting to other means of dues payments.  Many unions are carefully examining the program of Unite, the largest union in the United Kingdom, and it’s 100% campaign which has enrolled almost 100,000 members in recent years.  Talking to a key organizing department official recently from a US-based union, I was told one of the central lessons being learned was to start with your best units to achieve these results in order to set the pattern for your underperforming branches.

Unions working in California, New York, and other states allowing agency-fee payments are not sitting on their hands and crying in their beer.  Many are reporting success in transferring fee payers to members at relatively high levels.  In other states like Texas, where checkoff is threatened, unions have been able to move between 15% to over 50% of their members to alternative payment systems even though losing checkoff may be more than a year away.  Some unions have adopted the strategy of some UK and EU unions of only signing people up on standing orders or bank drafts and avoiding payroll deductions entirely.

There will be pain in the transition, but hard work and renewed activism may allow the labor movement to emerge stronger in the future than our current weakness has lead opponents to expect.  A critical insight for many unions may be one my friend argued when she said that her union had made the decision that it was no longer worth spending time and money fighting for dues programs rather than core membership issues.  In fact, fighting harder on the real issues for workers will likely lead to a surge in membership.  Anti-union forces may learn that they should have been more careful about what they hoped for, as workers wake up the sleeping giants within their own organizations.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail