No Lines That Can’t be Crossed and No Conflicts in Trump World

Buffalo    There are conflicts and there are conflicts, some are real and some are optical, but the bigger concern is simply the corporatization of government, public and foreign policy. The old saying, thought to have long ago been rejected, of “What’s good for GM is good for the country,” and essentially in that order, is now about to be resuscitated unapologetically as what’s good for almost any business is going to be in the first chair with the good of the country somewhere else down the line.

That’s scary. It is a topline ideological and cultural shift that puts the national interest and common good beneath corporate and elite self-interest. This isn’t draining the swamp. This is flooding the countryside.

There was a picture in all of the papers of the technology summit at Trump Tower with the President-elect and the big hits from Silicon Valley. The Microsofts, Facebooks, Googles, IBMs and the like were all arrayed around the table. Twitter was too small to attend, despite it being a favorite. Trump and the VP-to-come were there of course, but so were all three of the adult children, Eric, Donald Jr, and Ivanka. Really, is that appropriate? What signal is Trump sending? Is it that there is no line between family and national business?

The announcement of how conflicts of interest are going to be handled in Trump has been postponed. A work in progress obviously. Nonetheless, the trial balloons floated were that the boys and maybe Ivanka were going to run the old Trump businesses, and were going to have some kinds of firewalls between them and the President. What kind of message was he sending though having a family meeting with the tech-stars? Seems like this was a message about connecting tech to the government through the kids? Am I missing something? I don’t think so.

All reports also indicate that none of the vetting process for all of the nominees that have been rolling forward to fill the key cabinet positions has included much in the way of financial and conflict of interest questions, even though it is an absolute requirement when it comes to the Congressional investigation and vetting process. This looks like a train wreck coming.

We of course have several billionaires or near billionaires at Commerce, Treasury, Education, Small Business and the like who all have hefty balance sheets. What might the conflicts be there with their departments and worldwide footprints?

And, then there’s Rex Tillerson the current chief poohbah at Exxon Mobil, one of the world’s largest companies and of course an oil giant with operations in 60-countries. Tillerson has been nominated as Secretary of State, if you can believe it? He already has some issues with his closeness to Russia’s Putin and the fact that working at Exxon, he always put the interests of his company way, way ahead of the country including making deals with the Kurds and others in advance of US interests. There are also problems with his own wealth of a couple of hundred million from Exxon and whether or not that and similar oil investments might be blinding when it comes to usual national concerns.

This isn’t a slippery slope. This is greased slide into deepest and darkest swamp.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Mercury, Lead, Mountains of Old TVs, and Indian Recyclers

New Orleans    Some unfunny things are happening on the way to recycling companies when it comes to old televisions, computer monitors, and other electronic gear.  Recent reports and studies by environmental groups and the government indicate that in some cases it is getting there and then has nowhere to go, especially given the declining market for glass related products, and in other cases “paper transactions” are pretending to recycle while merrily sneaking to the local dumps or landfills, either domestically or to developing countries. What’s up with all of this mess?

Part of the problem is oversight.  Twenty-two states have laws making Sony, Apple and similar companies responsible for recycling their old products, but the Governmental Accounting Office (GAO) studies indicate that there is virtually no oversight of either state or federal recycling requirements.  Congress has also talked about passing laws that would forbid transporting such waste to foreign countries, but has not actually done so.  According to a recent report in the New York Times, 660 million pounds of old television and computer glass is sitting in warehouses and could cost between $85 and $360 million to “responsibly recycle” according to TransparentPlanet.

Companies are not manufacturing with any sense of the superfund sites they are building for the future.  Switching from cathode ray tubes tube glass to fluorescent lights used in flat screen components ignores the level of toxic mercury used in the CFL process, which has been pointed out by the Basel Action Network, an environmental advocacy group, among others.  Used screens have little recycling value so many recyclers pawn them off to landfills.

Karrie Gibson of Vintage Tech Recyclers notes that “greenwashing” where companies “pretend to engage in environmentally responsible disposal practices” helps keep the real prices artificially low.  According to Gibson, “They’re skimming off the computers, cellphones and printers that can be recycled profitably because they have precious metals…then they stockpile the CRTs, or dump it in landfills or abroad.”  The quantity is staggering.  The Times  told of a Yuma, Arizona glass recycler where state regulators “found a mountain of the lead-rich glass, several stories tall.  Dust…contaminated a nearby orchard with lead at 75 times the federal limit….”

ACORN International has organized thousands of members into associations of waste pickers in India in Mumbai, Delhi, and Bangalore.  India is one of the few countries in the world where plants still exist to manufacture new cathode ray tubes, compared to 13, many of which were in the United States, only a decade ago.  In megaslums like Dharavi in Mumbai talking to ACORN’s wastepickers, electronic waste is prized by many workers for the higher prices of precious metals when schools throw away old TVs and computers.  Many of these workers are still teenagers with developing lungs and brains who are most susceptible to toxic damage, yet desperate to make the 200 to 400 rupees a day adding up to less than $8 dollars in wages to support themselves and their families.

There are always consequences when no one cares where the industrial and societal problems are swept away or who down the line ends up doing the picking, sorting, and sweeping, and whether or not they will someday pay with their lives working with poison and living on poisoned land.

For a podcast of this blog.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail