Tag Archives: conservatives

Signs of Caution and Hope from Conservative Critics

New Orleans      Watchwords for all of us in this work have always included “know your enemy” and “keep them close.”  It is impossible to keep up in these days and times with all the right’s rage and social media screed, but some effort has to be made.  I try to at least read some of their more easily accessible voices, particularly columnists in the major papers, so I have a clue to the cleaned-up version of some of the elite conservative crud.  In the same way that the old saying holds that even a broken clock is right twice a day, sometimes in a shocking pinch-me-I’m-dreaming moment, they even align almost perfectly with my own views and fears recently.

David Brooks, a never-Trump conservative and cultural columnist for the New York Times became a prominent footnote to the power of the current national moment when he opined that moderate leadership has failed.  Yes, he was stating the obvious, but more significantly he admitted what none of the elites or common political wisdom has been very willing to concede: education is not the path to equity.  This has been the policy panacea for conservatives and liberals seemingly forever, and it has demonstrably proven itself inadequate as a mass solution.  Brooks throwing in the towel is a sign of hope that we may finally be able to have a real conversation.

Peggy Noonan who occupies a similar place at the Wall Street Journal is a hardcore conservative with credentials that go way back, and usually defaults to sweeten her positions with a “can’t we all be friends” plea for civility, tried to change cultural colors the other day.  She wrote a full-column fan letter to Bob Dylan, who many of us on the other side of the spectrum claim as one of our own, no matter the contradictions.

Just when we might think there is hope, we have to confront the fact that our worst fears are also recognized, when Ross Douthat, a more decisive and shrewd apologist for the right and conservative cutthroat when it comes to eviscerating arguments from all sides, voices them fully as he did in a column recently called, “The Second Defeat of Bernie Sanders.”  Trigger warning!  This is going to scare all of you to the degree he is spot on in expressing cautions for this moment.

He argues the following particularly about the Black Lives Matter movement,

  • …longer arc of the current revolutionary moment may actually end up vindicating the socialist critique of post-1970s liberalism — that it’s obsessed with cultural power at the expense of economic transformation, and that it puts the language of radicalism in the service of elitism.

  • …more unifying than the Sanders revolution precisely because it isn’t as threatening to power.

  • anti-racism as a cultural curriculum, a rhetoric of re-education, is relatively easy to fold into the mechanisms of managerialism….”

  • … revolutionaries need scapegoats …. to retire with prejudice. But they aren’t out to dissolve Harvard or break up Google or close The New York Times; they’re out to rule these institutions, with more enlightenment than the old guard but the same fundamental powers.

  • … few powerful people will feel particularly threatened if the purge of Confederate monuments widens….

  • …likely endgame of all this turbulence is the redistribution of elite jobs, the upward circulation of the more racially diverse younger generation, the abolition of perceived impediments to the management of elite diversity (adieu, SAT) and the inculcation of a new elite language whose academic style will delineate the professional class more decisively from the unenlightened proles below.

  • The promise of the Sanders campaign was that the insights of the older left, on class solidarity above all, could alter this depressing future and make the newer left something more than a handmaiden of oligarchy, a diversifier of late capitalism’s corporate boards.

Finally, and pointedly, Douthat reminds that “even for woke capital, capitalism comes first.”

If the shoe fits, wear it.  Don’t tell me some of his critique doesn’t come too close to home and speak to the same worries many of us have about whether or not this moment can turn into the kind of social change, justice, and equity that we’ve fought and dreamed of for so long.


Surprising UK Election Outcome – People Want to Organize!

Fort Lauderdale         The voters came out from under the rocks and jumped over the hedgerows to vote for the Conservatives behind weird and wacky Boris Johnson in the recent snap election in Britain.  Labour took a drubbing, even in the northern districts that had been their equivalent of the upper Midwest Democratic firewall.  Johnson claimed the largest electoral margin in Parliament since Margaret Thatcher.  All of this was about greasing the skids for Brexit.

There are almost as many theories about what it all means in the UK, and whether it signals danger for progressives elsewhere around the world, as there were votes.  Was this a rejection of the progressive platform of Labour which included tremendous support for tenants and affordable housing, free internet access, and a goody basket of other advances?  Perhaps, but others argued it was a rejection of the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, rather than the political program.

Talking to Nick Ballard, head organizer of ACORN in the UK, he was clear that the results were disappointing.  The Labour commitments to support tenant unions would have been huge for the ACORN Tenants Union which has been growing rapidly around the country in recent years.  At the same times, he kept arguing there were huge opportunities for us as well.  We were speaking only days after the election and an interesting thing had happened already:  ACORN’s membership had surged!  More than 200 members had joined in the aftermath of the election.  People weren’t crawling into holes or slow dancing at a pity party.  They were fired up and wanted to organize!

ACORN had been actively involved in trying to increase the number of tenants who were registered to vote in our offices.  The numbers had been impressive.  Total registration for this contentious election had surged by millions.  On some days hundreds of thousands had registered.  We were in that play all the way.

One of the interesting observations political commentators had made in the election run-up focused on the massive registration effort, particularly because the largest increases were among new young voters.  One noted that the way these new registrants were favoring Labour, “age, not class” was becoming the dividing line in British politics.

The Guardian featured ACORN’s efforts prominently, especially in the north around Manchester, Leeds, Liverpool, and Sheffield.  In the wake of the article, ACORN had another membership surge as new enrollments flooded our online portals.

Simultaneously, we received a request from the Community and Tenants’ Union (CATU) in Ireland to affiliate with ACORN.  Coincidence?  Probably.  But it all comes to sharp point at the same time.

We don’t know what the Conservative victory or the coming Brexit withdrawal will really mean for Britain, but from ACORN’s experience in these brief days before Christmas, it’s clear:  people want to organize, and they want to fight.